ANKIT YADAV vs State of Bihar — 282/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 303(2), 305(B). Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 08th April 2026.
Regular Bail
CNR: BRSW010034112026
Filing Number
3152/2026
Filing Date
07-Mar-2026
Registration No
282/2026
Registration Date
07-Mar-2026
Court
DJ Div. Siwan
Judge
24-District Additional and Sessions Judge-IV
Decision Date
08-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED
Last updated 25-Apr-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
787
Police Station
SIWAN TOWN
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.ANKIT YADAV
Adv. VIKAS KUMAR PANDEY
Respondent(s)
-
1.State of Bihar
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
08-Apr-2026
order
Summary The court granted bail to accused Ankit Yadav in a theft case (Siwan Nagar PS Case No. 787/2025) under IPC Sections 303(2) and 305(B). The accused was arrested on 05.02.2026 after a motorcycle was allegedly stolen from a coaching institute and later recovered. The court found the evidence circumstantial and the accused's prior criminal history disputed, ruling bail justified on deposit of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties and compliance with investigation requirements. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
08-Apr-2026
Disposed
District Additional and Sessions Judge-IV
-
02-Apr-2026
Hearing
District Additional and Sessions Judge-IV
-
25-Mar-2026
Hearing
District Additional and Sessions Judge-IV
-
19-Mar-2026
Hearing
District Additional and Sessions Judge-IV
-
12-Mar-2026
Hearing
District Additional and Sessions Judge-IV
-
10-Mar-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
07-Mar-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 282/2026
Summary The court granted bail to accused Ankit Yadav in a theft case (Siwan Nagar PS Case No. 787/2025) under IPC Sections 303(2) and 305(B). The accused was arrested on 05.02.2026 after a motorcycle was allegedly stolen from a coaching institute and later recovered. The court found the evidence circumstantial and the accused's prior criminal history disputed, ruling bail justified on deposit of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties and compliance with investigation requirements. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts