BHOLA SINGH ALIAS BHOLA RAO ALIAS ANUJ PRASAD vs State of Bihar — 281/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 126(2),115(2),109,352, 351(2),351(3),3(5). Disposed: Contested--REJECT on 26th March 2026.

Case disposed

Regular Bail

CNR: BRSW010034082026

Filing Number

3149/2026

Filing Date

07-Mar-2026

Registration No

281/2026

Registration Date

07-Mar-2026

Court

DJ Div. Siwan

Judge

3-District and Additional Sessions Judge-I

Decision Date

26-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--REJECT

Last updated 25-Apr-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

69

Police Station

NAUTAN

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 126(2),115(2),109,352, 351(2),351(3),3(5)
Arms Act Section 27

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.BHOLA SINGH ALIAS BHOLA RAO ALIAS ANUJ PRASAD

    Adv. VIKAS KUMAR PANDEY

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State of Bihar

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 26-Mar-2026

    orderView PDF

    The court rejected the bail application of Bhola Singh and others in Criminal Case No. 281/2026 arising from FIR No. 69/2026 at Nauran Police Station. The court found the allegations of firearm assault and criminal intimidation against the applicants to be serious and supported by witness testimony, determining that bail was not appropriate at this stage and that the applicants could renew their bail plea after the chargesheet is filed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 26-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    District and Additional Sessions Judge-I

  4. 19-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    District and Additional Sessions Judge-I

  5. 12-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    District and Additional Sessions Judge-I

  6. 10-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  7. 07-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 281/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The court rejected the bail application of Bhola Singh and others in Criminal Case No. 281/2026 arising from FIR No. 69/2026 at Nauran Police Station. The court found the allegations of firearm assault and criminal intimidation against the applicants to be serious and supported by witness testimony, determining that bail was not appropriate at this stage and that the applicants could renew their bail plea after the chargesheet is filed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case