MD AMJAD vs State of Bihar — 637/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 126(2),115(2),351(2),352,64,85,3/4. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 09th April 2026.
Anticipatory Bail
CNR: BRSW010034062026
Filing Number
3147/2026
Filing Date
07-Mar-2026
Registration No
637/2026
Registration Date
07-Mar-2026
Court
DJ Div. Siwan
Judge
3-District and Additional Sessions Judge-I
Decision Date
09-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED
Last updated 25-Apr-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
7
Police Station
Siwan Mahila P.S
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.MD AMJAD
Adv. SANJAY PRATAP SINGH
Respondent(s)
-
1.State of Bihar
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
09-Apr-2026
orderView PDF
Court Decision Summary: The Siwan District Court granted anticipatory bail to the accused Mohammad Amjad on April 9, 2026, in a dowry harassment case involving allegations of mental and physical abuse toward his wife. The court found the prosecution's allegations questionable, noting the complainant's departure from her in-laws' house on June 17, 2025, and her subsequent return, while no specific witness testimony substantiated the accusations. Bail was granted on condition of a bond of ₹20,000 with two sureties, provided the accused reconciles with his wife, ensures her maintenance and medical care, and appears regularly before the trial court. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
09-Apr-2026
Disposed
District and Additional Sessions Judge-I
-
04-Apr-2026
Hearing
District and Additional Sessions Judge-I
-
25-Mar-2026
Hearing
District and Additional Sessions Judge-I
-
24-Mar-2026
Hearing
District and Additional Sessions Judge-I
-
12-Mar-2026
Hearing
District and Additional Sessions Judge-I
-
10-Mar-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
07-Mar-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 637/2026
Court Decision Summary: The Siwan District Court granted anticipatory bail to the accused Mohammad Amjad on April 9, 2026, in a dowry harassment case involving allegations of mental and physical abuse toward his wife. The court found the prosecution's allegations questionable, noting the complainant's departure from her in-laws' house on June 17, 2025, and her subsequent return, while no specific witness testimony substantiated the accusations. Bail was granted on condition of a bond of ₹20,000 with two sureties, provided the accused reconciles with his wife, ensures her maintenance and medical care, and appears regularly before the trial court. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts