BALISTAR SINGH AND OTHERS vs THE STATE OF BIHAR — 556/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 115(2),126(2),118(1),76,352,3(5),351(2). Disposed: Contested--REJECT on 23rd March 2026.

Anticipatory Bail

CNR: BRSW010030432026

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

24-02-2026

Filing Number

2821/2026

Filing Date

24-02-2026

Registration No

556/2026

Registration Date

24-02-2026

Court

DJ Div. Siwan

Judge

3-District and Additional Sessions Judge-I

Decision Date

23rd March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--REJECT

FIR Details

FIR Number

5

Police Station

Siwan SC/ST P.S

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 115(2),126(2),118(1),76,352,3(5),351(2)
SC/ST Act Section 3(1)(r),3(1)(s),3(1)(w)

Petitioner(s)

BALISTAR SINGH AND OTHERS

Adv. RAM NARESH PANDIT

Respondent(s)

THE STATE OF BIHAR

Hearing History

Judge: 3-District and Additional Sessions Judge-I

23-03-2026

Disposed

17-03-2026

HEARING

10-03-2026

HEARING

07-03-2026

HEARING

26-02-2026

HEARING

Final Orders / Judgements

23-03-2026
order

Summary The court rejected the interim bail application filed by five accused persons (Balistar Singh, Tunnu, Ragho Singh, Shivoji Singh, and Prem Sagar Singh) in a case involving charges under IPC sections 115(2), 126(2), 118(1), 76, 352, 351(2), 3(5) and SC/ST Act sections 3(1)(r), 3(1)(s), 3(1)(w). The court found credible evidence from prosecution witnesses supporting the allegations that the accused attempted to illegally seize land belonging to the complainant (a scheduled caste woman) and assaulted her with weapons, causing serious injuries, dismissing the defense claim that the case was fabricated. The court held that the interim bail application was not maintainable under the SC/ST Act due to procedural bars and rejected it accordingly. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The court rejected the interim bail application filed by five accused persons (Balistar Singh, Tunnu, Ragho Singh, Shivoji Singh, and Prem Sagar Singh) in a case involving charges under IPC sections 115(2), 126(2), 118(1), 76, 352, 351(2), 3(5) and SC/ST Act sections 3(1)(r), 3(1)(s), 3(1)(w). The court found credible evidence from prosecution witnesses supporting the allegations that the accused attempted to illegally seize land belonging to the complainant (a scheduled caste woman) and assaulted her with weapons, causing serious injuries, dismissing the defense claim that the case was fabricated. The court held that the interim bail application was not maintainable under the SC/ST Act due to procedural bars and rejected it accordingly. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

DJ Div. Siwan All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case