MUKESH KUMAR PANDTI ALIAS MUKESH PANDIT vs STATE OF BIHAR — 233/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 309(4),317(2). Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 13th March 2026.
Regular Bail
CNR: BRSW010029022026
e-Filing Number
21-02-2026
Filing Number
2687/2026
Filing Date
21-Feb-2026
Registration No
233/2026
Registration Date
21-Feb-2026
Court
DJ Div. Siwan
Judge
3-Additional District and Sessions Judge-I
Decision Date
13-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED
Last updated 24-Mar-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.MUKESH KUMAR PANDTI ALIAS MUKESH PANDIT
Adv. Manoj Kumar Singh
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE OF BIHAR
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
13-Mar-2026
order
The court granted bail to accused Mukesh Kumar Pandit in a jewelry store robbery case (Case No. 233/2025) under IPC Sections 309(4) and 317(2), finding that the prosecution's case is based on weak and circumstantial evidence, and the accused's name appeared in the charge sheet only through a co-accused's confession statement. The court ordered the accused's release on bail with a surety of Rs. 20,000 and two sureties, directing him to cooperate in investigations and comply with bail conditions including providing mobile numbers and details as required under CrPC Section 486. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
13-Mar-2026
Disposed
Additional District and Sessions Judge-I
-
10-Mar-2026
Hearing
Additional District and Sessions Judge-I
-
07-Mar-2026
Hearing
Additional District and Sessions Judge-I
-
06-Mar-2026
Hearing
Additional District and Sessions Judge-I
-
02-Mar-2026
Hearing
Additional District and Sessions Judge-I
-
28-Feb-2026
Hearing
Additional District and Sessions Judge-I
-
26-Feb-2026
Hearing
Additional District and Sessions Judge-I
-
24-Feb-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
21-Feb-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 233/2026
The court granted bail to accused Mukesh Kumar Pandit in a jewelry store robbery case (Case No. 233/2025) under IPC Sections 309(4) and 317(2), finding that the prosecution's case is based on weak and circumstantial evidence, and the accused's name appeared in the charge sheet only through a co-accused's confession statement. The court ordered the accused's release on bail with a surety of Rs. 20,000 and two sureties, directing him to cooperate in investigations and comply with bail conditions including providing mobile numbers and details as required under CrPC Section 486. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts