RAJBANSHI RAM ALIAS BANSHILAL RAM vs State of Bihar — 223/2026

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 341,323,307,34. Disposed: Contested--REJECT on 10th March 2026.

Case disposed

Regular Bail

CNR: BRSW010027652026

Filing Number

2554/2026

Filing Date

19-Feb-2026

Registration No

223/2026

Registration Date

19-Feb-2026

Court

DJ Div. Siwan

Judge

1-Principal District and Session Judge

Decision Date

10-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--REJECT

Last updated 25-Apr-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

67

Police Station

RAGHUNATHPUR

Year

1999

Acts & Sections

Indian Penal Code Section 341,323,307,34

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.RAJBANSHI RAM ALIAS BANSHILAL RAM

    Adv. ANIL KUMAR TIWARI

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State of Bihar

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 10-Mar-2026

    order

    The Sessions Judge rejected the bail petition of Rajbanshi Ram, accused of assault with a gun butt under IPC sections 341, 323, and 307/34 in a 27-year-old case from 1999. The court found specific allegations against the petitioner supported by medical evidence of head injuries, noted his prior criminal antecedent, and considered his 27-year absconding period as grounds for denial, though permitted him to renew the bail application after charge framing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 10-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal District and Session Judge

  4. 02-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    Principal District and Session Judge

  5. 21-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 19-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 223/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Sessions Judge rejected the bail petition of Rajbanshi Ram, accused of assault with a gun butt under IPC sections 341, 323, and 307/34 in a 27-year-old case from 1999. The court found specific allegations against the petitioner supported by medical evidence of head injuries, noted his prior criminal antecedent, and considered his 27-year absconding period as grounds for denial, though permitted him to renew the bail application after charge framing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case