INTAZAR Ahmad vs State of Bihar — 476/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 64,62. Disposed: Contested--REJECT on 17th March 2026.
Anticipatory Bail
CNR: BRSW010026952026
e-Filing Number
18-02-2026
Filing Number
2491/2026
Filing Date
18-Feb-2026
Registration No
476/2026
Registration Date
18-Feb-2026
Court
DJ Div. Siwan
Judge
3-Additional District and Sessions Judge-I
Decision Date
17-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--REJECT
Last updated 24-Mar-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.INTAZAR Ahmad
Adv. MASROOR AHMAD
Respondent(s)
-
1.State of Bihar
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
17-Mar-2026
order
The court rejected the anticipatory bail application of accused Intejar Ahmed under Section 482 CrPC in a case involving alleged criminal intimidation and wrongful restraint (IPC Sections 64, 62) arising from FIR No. 522/2025. The court found the prosecution's allegations credible—that the accused deliberately assaulted a woman while she was returning from the market, causing her injuries—and held that the accused's defense claiming false charges was unsubstantiated and that the bail application was premature given the ongoing investigation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
17-Mar-2026
Disposed
Additional District and Sessions Judge-I
-
16-Mar-2026
Order
Additional District and Sessions Judge-I
-
13-Mar-2026
Hearing
Additional District and Sessions Judge-I
-
11-Mar-2026
Hearing
Additional District and Sessions Judge-I
-
10-Mar-2026
Hearing
Additional District and Sessions Judge-I
-
07-Mar-2026
Hearing
Additional District and Sessions Judge-I
-
06-Mar-2026
Hearing
Additional District and Sessions Judge-I
-
02-Mar-2026
Hearing
Additional District and Sessions Judge-I
-
23-Feb-2026
Hearing
Additional District and Sessions Judge-I
-
20-Feb-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
18-Feb-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 476/2026
The court rejected the anticipatory bail application of accused Intejar Ahmed under Section 482 CrPC in a case involving alleged criminal intimidation and wrongful restraint (IPC Sections 64, 62) arising from FIR No. 522/2025. The court found the prosecution's allegations credible—that the accused deliberately assaulted a woman while she was returning from the market, causing her injuries—and held that the accused's defense claiming false charges was unsubstantiated and that the bail application was premature given the ongoing investigation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts