AKASH KUMAR vs STATE OF BIHAR — 463/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 126(2)115(2)118(1)117(2)109,352,351(2)3(5). Disposed: Contested--REJECT on 30th March 2026.
Anticipatory Bail
CNR: BRSW010026422026
e-Filing Number
17-02-2026
Filing Number
2444/2026
Filing Date
17-Feb-2026
Registration No
463/2026
Registration Date
17-Feb-2026
Court
DJ Div. Siwan
Judge
3-District and Additional Sessions Judge-I
Decision Date
30-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--REJECT
Last updated 25-Apr-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
475
Police Station
BARHARIA
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.AKASH KUMAR
Adv. Vidhu Garg
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE OF BIHAR
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
30-Mar-2026
order
Summary The court rejected the bail application of Akash Kumar under the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act and IPC sections 126(2), 115(2), 118(1), 117(2), 109, 352, 351(2), 3(5). The court found that prima facie evidence supports the prosecution case that the accused assaulted the informant's brother with intent to cause grievous injury based on caste-based slurs, and bail was deemed inappropriate as the application was barred under SC/ST Act sections 18 and 18A. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
30-Mar-2026
Disposed
District and Additional Sessions Judge-I
-
26-Mar-2026
Restored
District and Additional Sessions Judge-I
-
26-Mar-2026
Order
District and Additional Sessions Judge-I
-
26-Mar-2026
Disposed
District and Additional Sessions Judge-I
-
18-Mar-2026
Order
District and Additional Sessions Judge-I
-
16-Mar-2026
Hearing
District and Additional Sessions Judge-I
-
12-Mar-2026
Hearing
District and Additional Sessions Judge-I
-
10-Mar-2026
Hearing
District and Additional Sessions Judge-I
-
28-Feb-2026
Hearing
District and Additional Sessions Judge-I
-
19-Feb-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
17-Feb-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 463/2026
Summary The court rejected the bail application of Akash Kumar under the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act and IPC sections 126(2), 115(2), 118(1), 117(2), 109, 352, 351(2), 3(5). The court found that prima facie evidence supports the prosecution case that the accused assaulted the informant's brother with intent to cause grievous injury based on caste-based slurs, and bail was deemed inappropriate as the application was barred under SC/ST Act sections 18 and 18A. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts