VIKASH YADAV vs State of Bihar — 204/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 309(4). Disposed: Contested--REJECT on 06th March 2026.

Case disposed

Regular Bail

CNR: BRSW010025512026

e-Filing Number

16-02-2026

Filing Number

2360/2026

Filing Date

16-Feb-2026

Registration No

204/2026

Registration Date

16-Feb-2026

Court

DJ Div. Siwan

Judge

3-Additional District and Sessions Judge-I

Decision Date

06-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--REJECT

Last updated 24-Mar-2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 309(4)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.VIKASH YADAV

    Adv. Pradip Kumar Mishra

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State of Bihar

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 06-Mar-2026

    order

  3. 06-Mar-2026

    order

    Case Summary The court rejected the bail application of Pavan Kumar in a case involving alleged assault, robbery, and theft (G.B. Nagar PS Case No. 597/2025 under IPC Section 309(4)). The court found the accusations credible based on the informant's detailed statement and corroborating witness testimonies, determining that bail was not appropriate given the serious nature of the charges and the risk to the investigation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  4. 06-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Additional District and Sessions Judge-I

  5. 02-Mar-2026

    Order

    Additional District and Sessions Judge-I

  6. 27-Feb-2026

    Order

    Additional District and Sessions Judge-I

  7. 25-Feb-2026

    Hearing

    Additional District and Sessions Judge-I

  8. 20-Feb-2026

    Hearing

    Additional District and Sessions Judge-I

  9. 18-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  10. 16-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 204/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary The court rejected the bail application of Pavan Kumar in a case involving alleged assault, robbery, and theft (G.B. Nagar PS Case No. 597/2025 under IPC Section 309(4)). The court found the accusations credible based on the informant's detailed statement and corroborating witness testimonies, determining that bail was not appropriate given the serious nature of the charges and the risk to the investigation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case