ANUP KUMAR vs State of Bihar — 453/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 126(2),115(2),303(2),324(4),109,351(2)3(5). Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 10th March 2026.

Case disposed

Anticipatory Bail

CNR: BRSW010025172026

e-Filing Number

14-02-2026

Filing Number

2326/2026

Filing Date

16-Feb-2026

Registration No

453/2026

Registration Date

16-Feb-2026

Court

DJ Div. Siwan

Judge

1-Principal District and Session Judge

Decision Date

10-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

Last updated 24-Mar-2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 126(2),115(2),303(2),324(4),109,351(2)3(5)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.ANUP KUMAR

    Adv. RITA KUMARI

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State of Bihar

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 10-Mar-2026

    orderView PDF

    Summary: The Sessions Judge granted anticipatory bail to Anup Kumar in a case involving alleged assault with lathis under BNS sections 126(2), 115(2), 303(2), 324(4), 109, 351(2), 352, and 3(5). The court found that while there were specific allegations against the petitioner, the injury sustained by the informant was simple in nature and inconsistent with the severity of the charges, and similarly situated co-accused had already been granted bail. The petitioner has no criminal antecedents, warranting bail. Conditions: The petitioner must furnish bail bonds of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties of equal amount upon arrest or surrender within six weeks. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 10-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal District and Session Judge

  4. 06-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    Principal District and Session Judge

  5. 20-Feb-2026

    Hearing

    Principal District and Session Judge

  6. 18-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  7. 16-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 453/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The Sessions Judge granted anticipatory bail to Anup Kumar in a case involving alleged assault with lathis under BNS sections 126(2), 115(2), 303(2), 324(4), 109, 351(2), 352, and 3(5). The court found that while there were specific allegations against the petitioner, the injury sustained by the informant was simple in nature and inconsistent with the severity of the charges, and similarly situated co-accused had already been granted bail. The petitioner has no criminal antecedents, warranting bail. Conditions: The petitioner must furnish bail bonds of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties of equal amount upon arrest or surrender within six weeks. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case