PAWAN KUMAR vs State of Bihar — 144/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 309(4). Disposed: Contested--REJECT on 06th March 2026.
Regular Bail
CNR: BRSW010016342026
e-Filing Number
30-01-2026
Filing Number
1503/2026
Filing Date
31-Jan-2026
Registration No
144/2026
Registration Date
31-Jan-2026
Court
DJ Div. Siwan
Judge
3-Additional District and Sessions Judge-I
Decision Date
06-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--REJECT
Last updated 24-Mar-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.PAWAN KUMAR
Adv. ASHISH KUMAR
Respondent(s)
-
1.State of Bihar
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
06-Mar-2026
order
The court rejected the bail application (Bail Petition No. 144/2026) of Pavan Kumar, who is accused of assaulting a person, stealing their motorcycle, and absconding on December 27, 2025, under IPC Section 309(4). The court found the allegations serious and credible, supported by witness testimony and the accused's own confession, and determined that granting bail would not be appropriate given the gravity of the offense and risk factors involved. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
06-Mar-2026
Disposed
Additional District and Sessions Judge-I
-
02-Mar-2026
Order
Additional District and Sessions Judge-I
-
28-Feb-2026
Order
Additional District and Sessions Judge-I
-
25-Feb-2026
Order
Additional District and Sessions Judge-I
-
20-Feb-2026
Hearing
Additional District and Sessions Judge-I
-
17-Feb-2026
Hearing
Additional District and Sessions Judge-I
-
16-Feb-2026
Hearing
Additional District and Sessions Judge-I
-
07-Feb-2026
Hearing
Additional District and Sessions Judge-I
-
06-Feb-2026
Hearing
Additional District and Sessions Judge-I
-
03-Feb-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
31-Jan-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 144/2026
The court rejected the bail application (Bail Petition No. 144/2026) of Pavan Kumar, who is accused of assaulting a person, stealing their motorcycle, and absconding on December 27, 2025, under IPC Section 309(4). The court found the allegations serious and credible, supported by witness testimony and the accused's own confession, and determined that granting bail would not be appropriate given the gravity of the offense and risk factors involved. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts