RABBUDDIN MIYAN vs State of Bihar — 106/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 341,354(B),376,511,323,506/34. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 06th March 2026.
Anticipatory Bail
CNR: BRSW010004772026
e-Filing Number
08-01-2026
Filing Number
1/2026
Filing Date
09-01-2026
Registration No
106/2026
Registration Date
09-01-2026
Court
DJ Div. Siwan
Judge
3-Additional District and Sessions Judge-I
Decision Date
06th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
RABBUDDIN MIYAN
Adv. Manoj Kumar Singh
Respondent(s)
State of Bihar
Hearing History
Judge: 3-Additional District and Sessions Judge-I
Disposed
ORDER
ORDER
HEARING
HEARING
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 06-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 28-02-2026 | ORDER |
| 26-02-2026 | ORDER |
| 20-02-2026 | HEARING |
| 11-02-2026 | HEARING |
Final Orders / Judgements
Court Decision Summary The Siwan District Court granted interim bail to three accused (Khuddin Miya, Shahabuddin Miya, and Salma Bibi) in a criminal case involving charges under IPC Sections 341, 354B, 376, 511, 323, and 506/34, arising from FIR No. 663/2022. The court found the settlement deed (sulh-nama) executed between the accused and complainant credible, noting the complainant appeared in court supporting the settlement without coercion. The accused were released on bail with a bond of ₹20,000 and two sureties, subject to compliance with CrPC Section 486 conditions. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Court Decision Summary The Siwan District Court granted interim bail to three accused (Khuddin Miya, Shahabuddin Miya, and Salma Bibi) in a criminal case involving charges under IPC Sections 341, 354B, 376, 511, 323, and 506/34, arising from FIR No. 663/2022. The court found the settlement deed (sulh-nama) executed between the accused and complainant credible, noting the complainant appeared in court supporting the settlement without coercion. The accused were released on bail with a bond of ₹20,000 and two sureties, subject to compliance with CrPC Section 486 conditions. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts