BITTU KUMAR vs State of Bihar — 47/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 126(2),115(2),117(1),118,109,352,35. Disposed: Contested--REJECT on 10th April 2026.
Anticipatory Bail
CNR: BRSW010002002026
e-Filing Number
05-01-2026
Filing Number
180/2026
Filing Date
05-01-2026
Registration No
47/2026
Registration Date
05-01-2026
Court
DJ Div. Siwan
Judge
3-District and Additional Sessions Judge-I
Decision Date
10th April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--REJECT
FIR Details
FIR Number
81
Police Station
BARHARIA
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
BITTU KUMAR
Adv. MANOJ KUAR SINGH
Respondent(s)
State of Bihar
Hearing History
Judge: 3-District and Additional Sessions Judge-I
Disposed
HEARING
HEARING
HEARING
HEARING
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 10-04-2026 | Disposed | |
| 07-04-2026 | HEARING | |
| 06-04-2026 | HEARING | |
| 02-04-2026 | HEARING | |
| 26-03-2026 | HEARING |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary The court rejected the anticipatory bail petition of six accused persons (Bittu Kumar, Mantu Kumar, Sanjay Singh, Sonu Singh, Nitish Kumar, and Pradumn Singh) in a case involving charges under SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act and IPC sections including assault and criminal intimidation. The court found credible evidence supporting the prosecution's allegations that the accused attacked two members of a Scheduled Caste while they were riding a tractor, causing serious injuries, and dismissed their claim of being falsely implicated. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary The court rejected the anticipatory bail petition of six accused persons (Bittu Kumar, Mantu Kumar, Sanjay Singh, Sonu Singh, Nitish Kumar, and Pradumn Singh) in a case involving charges under SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act and IPC sections including assault and criminal intimidation. The court found credible evidence supporting the prosecution's allegations that the accused attacked two members of a Scheduled Caste while they were riding a tractor, causing serious injuries, and dismissed their claim of being falsely implicated. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts