SUBHADRA DEVI vs SUNITA DEVI — 487/2019
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 323,341,379,354(B),147. Disposed: Uncontested--DISMISSED on 10th March 2026.
Cr. Case Complaint (P)
CNR: BRSU110012802019
Filing Number
1280/2019
Filing Date
04-12-2019
Registration No
487/2019
Registration Date
04-12-2019
Court
Birpur CJM Division
Judge
2-S.D.J.M.
Decision Date
10th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--DISMISSED
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
SUBHADRA DEVI
Adv. MR. MIRTUNJAY SINGH
Respondent(s)
SUNITA DEVI
Hearing History
Judge: 2-S.D.J.M.
Disposed
Enquiry AND Witness
Enquiry AND Witness
Enquiry AND Witness
Enquiry AND Witness
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 10-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 09-03-2026 | Enquiry AND Witness |
| 20-01-2026 | Enquiry AND Witness |
| 11-12-2025 | Enquiry AND Witness |
| 20-11-2025 | Enquiry AND Witness |
Final Orders / Judgements
The document is handwritten in Hindi and while partially legible, the image quality and handwriting make it difficult to read with complete certainty. However, it appears to be a judicial order dated 10.7.26 (possibly from 1926 or a case number reference) discussing matters related to petitioner's rights and relief under Article 203 of what seems to be an Indian procedural code. The court appears to be addressing questions of jurisdiction and relief available to the petitioner in the matter. Due to the handwriting quality and image resolution, I cannot provide a fully confident summary of the specific decision. A clearer or typed version would be needed for accurate analysis. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The document is handwritten in Hindi and while partially legible, the image quality and handwriting make it difficult to read with complete certainty. However, it appears to be a judicial order dated 10.7.26 (possibly from 1926 or a case number reference) discussing matters related to petitioner's rights and relief under Article 203 of what seems to be an Indian procedural code. The court appears to be addressing questions of jurisdiction and relief available to the petitioner in the matter. Due to the handwriting quality and image resolution, I cannot provide a fully confident summary of the specific decision. A clearer or typed version would be needed for accurate analysis. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts