AJAY KUMAR SINGH vs CHITRANJAN MAHTO Advocate - UNKNOWN — 388/2019
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 341,323,379,34. Disposed: Uncontested--JUDGEMENT on 10th March 2026.
CRI. CASE
CNR: BRSU110006122019
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
612/2019
Filing Date
14-06-2019
Registration No
388/2019
Registration Date
15-06-2019
Court
Birpur CJM Division
Judge
3-Judicial Magistrate 1st Class-I
Decision Date
10th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--JUDGEMENT
FIR Details
FIR Number
100
Police Station
NIRMALI
Year
2019
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
AJAY KUMAR SINGH
Adv. UNKNOWN
Respondent(s)
CHITRANJAN MAHTO Advocate - UNKNOWN
Hearing History
Judge: 3-Judicial Magistrate 1st Class-I
Disposed
EVIDENCE
EVIDENCE
EVIDENCE
EVIDENCE
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 10-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 17-12-2025 | EVIDENCE | |
| 29-10-2025 | EVIDENCE | |
| 18-08-2025 | EVIDENCE | |
| 21-06-2025 | EVIDENCE |
Final Orders / Judgements
This is a Hindi-language judicial order from the Court of Shri Pankaj Kumar, Additional District Judge, First Grade, Veerapur. The court dismissed three accusations (Vichitranzan Mahto, Manoranjan Mahto, and Aayush Ranjan) under IPC Section 341, 323, 504/34 (wrongful restraint, voluntarily causing hurt, and insult with intent to provoke breach of peace) due to insufficient evidence and lack of credible witness testimony to establish the charges beyond reasonable doubt. The court found that the prosecution failed to prove its case and therefore acquitted all accused persons. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
This is a Hindi-language judicial order from the Court of Shri Pankaj Kumar, Additional District Judge, First Grade, Veerapur. The court dismissed three accusations (Vichitranzan Mahto, Manoranjan Mahto, and Aayush Ranjan) under IPC Section 341, 323, 504/34 (wrongful restraint, voluntarily causing hurt, and insult with intent to provoke breach of peace) due to insufficient evidence and lack of credible witness testimony to establish the charges beyond reasonable doubt. The court found that the prosecution failed to prove its case and therefore acquitted all accused persons. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts