BHULIYA DEVI vs RANJEET MANDAL — 161/2025
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 303(2),317(2),3(5). Disposed: Uncontested--SETTLED IN LOK ADALAT on 14th March 2026.
CRI. CASE
CNR: BRSU110002062025
Filing Number
206/2025
Filing Date
11-Feb-2025
Registration No
161/2025
Registration Date
11-Feb-2025
Court
Birpur CJM Division
Judge
3-Judicial Magistrate 1st Class-I
Decision Date
14-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--SETTLED IN LOK ADALAT
Last updated 14-Jun-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
0034
Police Station
DAGMARA
Year
2024
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.BHULIYA DEVI
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
-
1.RANJEET MANDAL
-
2.RAMNANDAN KUMAR
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
14-Mar-2026
OrderView PDF
The court (dated 14.03.2026) held that the dispute between the parties is covered under relevant sections of the Civil Procedure Code and concerns claims of both legal and equitable nature. The court ruled that the dispute shall be decided based on evidence and submissions of both parties, and directed the office to file the plaint in accordance with procedural rules. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
14-Mar-2026
Disposed
Judicial Magistrate 1st Class-I
-
30-Jan-2026
Charge
Judicial Magistrate 1st Class-I
-
13-Jan-2026
Charge
Judicial Magistrate 1st Class-I
-
17-Dec-2025
Charge
Judicial Magistrate 1st Class-I
-
25-Nov-2025
Appearence
Judicial Magistrate 1st Class-I
-
20-Aug-2025
Appearence
Judicial Magistrate 1st Class-I
-
04-Jun-2025
Hearing on Point of Cognizance
Judicial Magistrate 1st Class-I
-
11-Feb-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
11-Feb-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 161/2025
The court (dated 14.03.2026) held that the dispute between the parties is covered under relevant sections of the Civil Procedure Code and concerns claims of both legal and equitable nature. The court ruled that the dispute shall be decided based on evidence and submissions of both parties, and directed the office to file the plaint in accordance with procedural rules. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts