LALIT NARAYAN JHA AND OTHERS vs State of Bihar Advocate - JAI NARAYAN PANDEY — 1858/2025
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 126(2),115(2),118(1),109,352,351(2),3(5). Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 16th March 2026.
Anticipatory Bail
CNR: BRSU010123902025
Filing Number
11863/2025
Filing Date
24-12-2025
Registration No
1858/2025
Registration Date
24-12-2025
Court
DJ Div. Supaul
Judge
7-Principal District and Session Judge
Decision Date
16th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED
FIR Details
FIR Number
205
Police Station
KISHANPUR
Year
2024
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
LALIT NARAYAN JHA AND OTHERS
Adv. KAUSHAL KUMAR SINGH
Respondent(s)
State of Bihar Advocate - JAI NARAYAN PANDEY
Hearing History
Judge: 7-Principal District and Session Judge
Disposed
HEARING
HEARING
HEARING
HEARING
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 16-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 06-03-2026 | HEARING |
| 23-02-2026 | HEARING |
| 12-02-2026 | HEARING |
| 03-02-2026 | HEARING |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: ABA-1858/2025 The Sessions Judge, Supaul granted anticipatory bail to Lalit Narayan Jha and six co-petitioners in a land dispute case. The court found that police submitted chargesheet against only 5 of 15 accused under bailable sections, with no evidence against the remaining petitioners, yet the magistrate took cognizance under graver sections. Since investigation was complete, accused were permanent residents with no absconding risk, the court allowed bail with Rs. 20,000 bond each and two sureties per person. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: ABA-1858/2025 The Sessions Judge, Supaul granted anticipatory bail to Lalit Narayan Jha and six co-petitioners in a land dispute case. The court found that police submitted chargesheet against only 5 of 15 accused under bailable sections, with no evidence against the remaining petitioners, yet the magistrate took cognizance under graver sections. Since investigation was complete, accused were permanent residents with no absconding risk, the court allowed bail with Rs. 20,000 bond each and two sureties per person. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts