SANTOSH KUMAR GUPTA AND OTHERS vs State of Bihar Advocate - JAI NARAYAN PANDEY — 1856/2025
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 498A,323,34. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 24th March 2026.
Anticipatory Bail
CNR: BRSU010123262025
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
11800/2025
Filing Date
24-12-2025
Registration No
1856/2025
Registration Date
24-12-2025
Court
DJ Div. Supaul
Judge
7-Principal District and Session Judge
Decision Date
24th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
SANTOSH KUMAR GUPTA AND OTHERS
Adv. JANARDAN PRASAD SAH
Respondent(s)
State of Bihar Advocate - JAI NARAYAN PANDEY
Hearing History
Judge: 7-Principal District and Session Judge
Disposed
HEARING
HEARING
HEARING
HEARING
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 24-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 10-03-2026 | HEARING | |
| 23-02-2026 | HEARING | |
| 12-02-2026 | HEARING | |
| 28-01-2026 | HEARING |
Final Orders / Judgements
The Sessions Judge, Supaul granted anticipatory bail to all four accused persons (Santosh Kumar Gupta, Kalicharan Gupta, Veena Devi, and Shankar Kumar Gupta) in a dowry harassment case under IPC sections 498(A), 323, 341 and the Dowry Prohibition Act. The court found the allegations lacked specific details beyond the main grievance that the husband purchased property in his mother's name, and noted no custodial interrogation was required since the complainant is a police constable. Each accused was directed to furnish bail bonds of Rs. 20,000 with two sureties of equal amount within 15 days. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The Sessions Judge, Supaul granted anticipatory bail to all four accused persons (Santosh Kumar Gupta, Kalicharan Gupta, Veena Devi, and Shankar Kumar Gupta) in a dowry harassment case under IPC sections 498(A), 323, 341 and the Dowry Prohibition Act. The court found the allegations lacked specific details beyond the main grievance that the husband purchased property in his mother's name, and noted no custodial interrogation was required since the complainant is a police constable. Each accused was directed to furnish bail bonds of Rs. 20,000 with two sureties of equal amount within 15 days. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts