ARBIND KUMAR JHA AND OTHERS vs State of Bihar Advocate - JAI NARAYAN PANDEY — 1850/2025
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 126(2),115(2),117(2),118(2),352,351(2),3(5). Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 16th March 2026.
Anticipatory Bail
CNR: BRSU010120942025
Filing Number
11571/2025
Filing Date
23-12-2025
Registration No
1850/2025
Registration Date
23-12-2025
Court
DJ Div. Supaul
Judge
7-Principal District and Session Judge
Decision Date
16th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED
FIR Details
FIR Number
205
Police Station
KISHANPUR
Year
2024
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
ARBIND KUMAR JHA AND OTHERS
Adv. HARISH CHANDRA MISHRA
Respondent(s)
State of Bihar Advocate - JAI NARAYAN PANDEY
Hearing History
Judge: 7-Principal District and Session Judge
Disposed
HEARING
HEARING
HEARING
HEARING
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 16-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 06-03-2026 | HEARING |
| 23-02-2026 | HEARING |
| 12-02-2026 | HEARING |
| 03-02-2026 | HEARING |
Final Orders / Judgements
The Sessions Judge, Supaul allowed anticipatory bail for 15 accused persons in two consolidated applications arising from a land dispute case involving alleged criminal intimidation and attempted forcible occupation of agricultural land. The court found that while police filed charges against only 5 accused, the magistrate took cognizance against all 15 under graver sections; noting investigation was complete, all were local residents with no flight risk, the court granted bail with Rs.20,000 bonds and two sureties each, subject to section 482 BNSS conditions. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The Sessions Judge, Supaul allowed anticipatory bail for 15 accused persons in two consolidated applications arising from a land dispute case involving alleged criminal intimidation and attempted forcible occupation of agricultural land. The court found that while police filed charges against only 5 accused, the magistrate took cognizance against all 15 under graver sections; noting investigation was complete, all were local residents with no flight risk, the court granted bail with Rs.20,000 bonds and two sureties each, subject to section 482 BNSS conditions. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts