MD. AKHTAR MIYAN vs State of Bihar Advocate - JAI NARAYAN PANDEY — 1837/2025

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 126(2),115,110,132,352,351(2),3(5). Disposed: Contested--REJECT on 10th April 2026.

Anticipatory Bail

CNR: BRSU010119542025

Case disposed

Filing Number

11433/2025

Filing Date

22-12-2025

Registration No

1837/2025

Registration Date

22-12-2025

Court

DJ Div. Supaul

Judge

7-Principal District and Session Judge

Decision Date

10th April 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--REJECT

FIR Details

FIR Number

241

Police Station

KISHANPUR

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 126(2),115,110,132,352,351(2),3(5)

Petitioner(s)

MD. AKHTAR MIYAN

Adv. RAJKUMAR SINGH

Respondent(s)

State of Bihar Advocate - JAI NARAYAN PANDEY

Hearing History

Judge: 7-Principal District and Session Judge

10-04-2026

Disposed

01-04-2026

HEARING

23-03-2026

HEARING

12-03-2026

HEARING

25-02-2026

HEARING

Final Orders / Judgements

10-04-2026
Copy of order

Case Summary: ABA-1837/2025 The Sessions Judge rejected the anticipatory bail application of MD. Akhtar Miyan, who was accused of assaulting a Panchayat official, snatching government documents, and obstructing public duty on 24.11.2025. The court found the allegations serious, corroborated by multiple witnesses, and noted the co-accused's prior criminal history and potential for evidence tampering, rendering bail unjustified. The petitioner was directed to surrender within 15 days and seek regular bail from the lower court. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: ABA-1837/2025 The Sessions Judge rejected the anticipatory bail application of MD. Akhtar Miyan, who was accused of assaulting a Panchayat official, snatching government documents, and obstructing public duty on 24.11.2025. The court found the allegations serious, corroborated by multiple witnesses, and noted the co-accused's prior criminal history and potential for evidence tampering, rendering bail unjustified. The petitioner was directed to surrender within 15 days and seek regular bail from the lower court. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

DJ Div. Supaul All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case