MD. KASIM KHAN vs State of Bihar Advocate - JAI NARAYAN PANDEY — 1800/2025
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 126(2),115,110,303(2),352,351(2),3(5). Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 24th March 2026.
Anticipatory Bail
CNR: BRSU010117062025
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
11196/2025
Filing Date
17-12-2025
Registration No
1800/2025
Registration Date
17-12-2025
Court
DJ Div. Supaul
Judge
1-District and Additional Sessions Judge-I-cum-Special Judge SC/ST
Decision Date
24th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED
FIR Details
FIR Number
224
Police Station
KISHANPUR
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
MD. KASIM KHAN
Adv. RAJENDRA PRASAD MANDAL
Respondent(s)
State of Bihar Advocate - JAI NARAYAN PANDEY
Hearing History
Judge: 1-District and Additional Sessions Judge-I-cum-Special Judge SC/ST
Disposed
HEARING
HEARING
HEARING
HEARING
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 24-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 10-03-2026 | HEARING | |
| 23-02-2026 | HEARING | |
| 13-02-2026 | HEARING | |
| 07-02-2026 | HEARING |
Final Orders / Judgements
SUMMARY: The District and Sessions Court, Supaul (Bihar) granted anticipatory bail to Mo. Kasim Khan in FIR No. 224/25 (Kishanpur Police Station). The court found that while serious charges were registered against the accused, a settlement (compromise) had been reached between both parties, and the complainant/victim did not oppose the bail application. The accused had no criminal history, and the court noted that specific charges against him were weak, with the medical evidence not supporting serious injuries on the complainant. Accordingly, bail was granted on a personal bond of ₹10,000 with two sureties, subject to the accused's surrender to the lower court within 15 days under Section 482 CrPC provisions. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
SUMMARY: The District and Sessions Court, Supaul (Bihar) granted anticipatory bail to Mo. Kasim Khan in FIR No. 224/25 (Kishanpur Police Station). The court found that while serious charges were registered against the accused, a settlement (compromise) had been reached between both parties, and the complainant/victim did not oppose the bail application. The accused had no criminal history, and the court noted that specific charges against him were weak, with the medical evidence not supporting serious injuries on the complainant. Accordingly, bail was granted on a personal bond of ₹10,000 with two sureties, subject to the accused's surrender to the lower court within 15 days under Section 482 CrPC provisions. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts