SANJAY KUMAR vs State of Bihar Advocate - JAI NARAYAN PANDEY — 1794/2025
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 126(2),115,110,132,352,351(2),3(5). Disposed: Contested--REJECT on 10th April 2026.
Anticipatory Bail
CNR: BRSU010115672025
Filing Number
11058/2025
Filing Date
16-12-2025
Registration No
1794/2025
Registration Date
16-12-2025
Court
DJ Div. Supaul
Judge
7-Principal District and Session Judge
Decision Date
10th April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--REJECT
FIR Details
FIR Number
241
Police Station
KISHANPUR
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
SANJAY KUMAR
Adv. RAJKUMAR SINGH
Respondent(s)
State of Bihar Advocate - JAI NARAYAN PANDEY
Hearing History
Judge: 7-Principal District and Session Judge
Disposed
HEARING
HEARING
HEARING
HEARING
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 10-04-2026 | Disposed |
| 01-04-2026 | HEARING |
| 23-03-2026 | HEARING |
| 12-03-2026 | HEARING |
| 25-02-2026 | HEARING |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary: The Sessions Judge, Supaul rejected anticipatory bail applications filed by Sanjay Kumar and Md. Akhtar Miyan, who were accused of assaulting a Panchayat employee, snatching government documents, and obstructing public duty on 24.11.2025. The court found the allegations serious, noting multiple witness corroboration, Sanjay Kumar's involvement in two prior criminal cases, and the risk of evidence tampering given his position as a police constable and connection to local leadership. Both accused were directed to surrender within 15 days and seek regular bail. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: The Sessions Judge, Supaul rejected anticipatory bail applications filed by Sanjay Kumar and Md. Akhtar Miyan, who were accused of assaulting a Panchayat employee, snatching government documents, and obstructing public duty on 24.11.2025. The court found the allegations serious, noting multiple witness corroboration, Sanjay Kumar's involvement in two prior criminal cases, and the risk of evidence tampering given his position as a police constable and connection to local leadership. Both accused were directed to surrender within 15 days and seek regular bail. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts