OM PRAKASH SAH vs State of Bihar Advocate - JAI NARAYAN PANDEY — 1723/2025
Case under Mines and Minerals(regulation and Development)act Section 4,21. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 23rd March 2026.
Anticipatory Bail
CNR: BRSU010105462025
Filing Number
10053/2025
Filing Date
02-12-2025
Registration No
1723/2025
Registration Date
02-12-2025
Court
DJ Div. Supaul
Judge
7-Principal District and Session Judge
Decision Date
23rd March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED
FIR Details
FIR Number
169
Police Station
Bhaptiyahi
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
OM PRAKASH SAH
Adv. TEJ NARAYAN GUPTA
Respondent(s)
State of Bihar Advocate - JAI NARAYAN PANDEY
Hearing History
Judge: 7-Principal District and Session Judge
Disposed
HEARING
HEARING
HEARING
HEARING
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 23-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 16-03-2026 | HEARING |
| 26-02-2026 | HEARING |
| 17-02-2026 | HEARING |
| 07-02-2026 | HEARING |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: 1723/2025 The court granted anticipatory bail to Om Prakash Sah in a mining-related FIR (Bhaptiyahi Police Station Case No. 169/2025) involving charges under the MMDR Rules 2019 and Forest Conservation Act 1986. The court found that Sah had deposited the required mining fee of ₹1,11,875 through e-challan on 01/12/2024, complied with regulatory requirements, and faced charges carrying a maximum sentence of less than 7 years, making him eligible for bail under Supreme Court precedent ("Satendra Kumar Antil" case). Bail was granted on condition of furnishing a bond of ₹20,000 with two sureties before the lower court. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: 1723/2025 The court granted anticipatory bail to Om Prakash Sah in a mining-related FIR (Bhaptiyahi Police Station Case No. 169/2025) involving charges under the MMDR Rules 2019 and Forest Conservation Act 1986. The court found that Sah had deposited the required mining fee of ₹1,11,875 through e-challan on 01/12/2024, complied with regulatory requirements, and faced charges carrying a maximum sentence of less than 7 years, making him eligible for bail under Supreme Court precedent ("Satendra Kumar Antil" case). Bail was granted on condition of furnishing a bond of ₹20,000 with two sureties before the lower court. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts