GULAB PASWAN vs RAM VILAS RAJAK AND OTHERS — 260/2023

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 147,148,149,341,323,307,354A,504,506. Disposed: Contested--ACQUITTED on 09th April 2026.

Case disposed

SESSION CASE

CNR: BRSU010050362023

Filing Number

5036/2023

Filing Date

27-Jun-2023

Registration No

260/2023

Registration Date

27-Jun-2023

Court

DJ Div. Supaul

Judge

7-Principal District and Session Judge

Decision Date

09-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ACQUITTED

Last updated 25-Apr-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

36

Police Station

KARJAIN

Year

2020

Acts & Sections

Indian Penal Code Section 147,148,149,341,323,307,354A,504,506

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.GULAB PASWAN

    Adv. PP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.RAM VILAS RAJAK AND OTHERS

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 09-Apr-2026

    Copy of JudgmentsView PDF

    Case Summary The Sessions Court of Supaul acquitted all seven accused persons (Ram Bilash Rajak, Sanjay Rajak, Chottu Rajak, Ajay Rajak, Vijay Rajak, Krishna Mohan Rajak, and Rahul Rajak) of charges under IPC Sections 147, 148, 341, 323, 307, 354(A), 504, 506 read with Section 149. The court found that the prosecution's key witness (the informant) admitted to compromising the matter and that all three witnesses turned hostile, providing no evidence of guilt. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 09-Apr-2026

    Disposed

    Principal District and Session Judge

  4. 07-Apr-2026

    Argument

    Principal District and Session Judge

  5. 30-Mar-2026

    Evidence

    Principal District and Session Judge

  6. 24-Mar-2026

    Evidence

    Principal District and Session Judge

  7. 10-Mar-2026

    Evidence

    Principal District and Session Judge

  8. 21-Feb-2026

    Evidence

    Principal District and Session Judge

  9. 16-Jan-2026

    Evidence

    Principal District and Session Judge

  10. 10-Dec-2025

    Evidence

    Principal District and Session Judge

  11. 26-Nov-2025

    Evidence

    Principal District and Session Judge

  12. 10-Oct-2025

    Evidence

    Principal District and Session Judge

  13. 19-Aug-2025

    Evidence

    Principal District and Session Judge

  14. 23-Jul-2025

    Evidence

    Principal District and Session Judge

  15. 12-Jun-2025

    Evidence

    Principal District and Session Judge

  16. 30-Apr-2025

    Evidence

    Principal District and Session Judge

  17. 11-Mar-2025

    Evidence

    Principal District and Session Judge

  18. 23-Jan-2025

    Evidence

    Principal District and Session Judge

  19. 29-Nov-2024

    Evidence

    Principal District and Session Judge

  20. 26-Sep-2024

    Evidence

    Principal District and Session Judge

  21. 14-Aug-2024

    Evidence

    Principal District and Session Judge

  22. 27-Jun-2024

    Evidence

    Principal District and Session Judge

  23. 21-May-2024

    Evidence

    Principal District and Session Judge

  24. 06-Mar-2024

    Evidence

    Principal District and Session Judge

  25. 22-Dec-2023

    Evidence

    Principal District and Session Judge

  26. 18-Oct-2023

    Evidence

    Principal District and Session Judge

  27. 29-Aug-2023

    Evidence

    Principal District and Session Judge

  28. 25-Jul-2023

    Charge

    Principal District and Session Judge

  29. 22-Jul-2023

    Charge

    Principal District and Session Judge

  30. 05-Jul-2023

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  31. 27-Jun-2023

    Case filed

    Registration No. 260/2023

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary The Sessions Court of Supaul acquitted all seven accused persons (Ram Bilash Rajak, Sanjay Rajak, Chottu Rajak, Ajay Rajak, Vijay Rajak, Krishna Mohan Rajak, and Rahul Rajak) of charges under IPC Sections 147, 148, 341, 323, 307, 354(A), 504, 506 read with Section 149. The court found that the prosecution's key witness (the informant) admitted to compromising the matter and that all three witnesses turned hostile, providing no evidence of guilt. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case