VIVEK KUMAR vs RAMANAND YADAV — 170/2022

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 489B,489C,419,420. Disposed: Contested--ACQUITTED on 19th May 2026.

Case disposed

SESSION CASE

CNR: BRSU010030092022

Filing Number

2944/2022

Filing Date

30-May-2022

Registration No

170/2022

Registration Date

30-May-2022

Court

DJ Div. Supaul

Judge

7-Principal District and Session Judge

Decision Date

19-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ACQUITTED

Last updated 06-Jul-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

6

Police Station

KUNAULI

Year

2020

Acts & Sections

Indian Penal Code Section 489B,489C,419,420

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.VIVEK KUMAR

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.RAMANAND YADAV

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 19-May-2026

    Copy of JudgmentsView PDF

    The Sessions Court in Supaul acquitted accused Ramanand Yadav of charges under IPC Sections 489(B) and 489(C) (counterfeiting currency) on May 19, 2026. The court found that the prosecution failed to prove its case because three of four witnesses were declared hostile and provided no credible testimony, material witnesses failed to appear despite summons, and only one witness (Vivek Kumar) supported the prosecution's account of recovering fifteen fake Rs.500 notes from the accused at the Indo-Nepal border. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 19-May-2026

    Disposed

    Principal District and Session Judge

  4. 18-May-2026

    Statement U/S.313 Cr.p.c.

    Principal District and Session Judge

  5. 29-Apr-2026

    Statement U/S.313 Cr.p.c.

    Principal District and Session Judge

  6. 25-Mar-2026

    Evidence

    Principal District and Session Judge

  7. 17-Feb-2026

    Evidence

    Principal District and Session Judge

  8. 17-Jan-2026

    Evidence

    Principal District and Session Judge

  9. 02-Dec-2025

    Evidence

    Principal District and Session Judge

  10. 16-Oct-2025

    Evidence

    Principal District and Session Judge

  11. 19-Sep-2025

    Evidence

    Principal District and Session Judge

  12. 04-Aug-2025

    Evidence

    Principal District and Session Judge

  13. 26-Jun-2025

    Evidence

    Principal District and Session Judge

  14. 15-May-2025

    Evidence

    Principal District and Session Judge

  15. 27-Mar-2025

    Evidence

    Principal District and Session Judge

  16. 07-Feb-2025

    Evidence

    Principal District and Session Judge

  17. 15-Jan-2025

    Evidence

    Principal District and Session Judge

  18. 09-Jan-2025

    Evidence

    Principal District and Session Judge

  19. 19-Nov-2024

    Evidence

    Principal District and Session Judge

  20. 10-Sep-2024

    Evidence

    Principal District and Session Judge

  21. 22-Jul-2024

    Evidence

    Principal District and Session Judge

  22. 15-May-2024

    Evidence

    Principal District and Session Judge

  23. 01-Apr-2024

    Evidence

    Principal District and Session Judge

  24. 20-Jan-2024

    Evidence

    Principal District and Session Judge

  25. 10-Nov-2023

    Evidence

    Principal District and Session Judge

  26. 18-Sep-2023

    Evidence

    Principal District and Session Judge

  27. 10-Aug-2023

    Evidence

    Principal District and Session Judge

  28. 14-Jun-2023

    Evidence

    Principal District and Session Judge

  29. 06-Apr-2023

    Evidence

    Principal District and Session Judge

  30. 19-Jan-2023

    Evidence

    Principal District and Session Judge

  31. 18-Nov-2022

    Evidence

    Principal District and Session Judge

  32. 16-Sep-2022

    Evidence

    Principal District and Session Judge

  33. 06-Aug-2022

    Evidence

    Principal District and Session Judge

  34. 16-Jun-2022

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  35. 30-May-2022

    Case filed

    Registration No. 170/2022

casestatus.in Summary

The Sessions Court in Supaul acquitted accused Ramanand Yadav of charges under IPC Sections 489(B) and 489(C) (counterfeiting currency) on May 19, 2026. The court found that the prosecution failed to prove its case because three of four witnesses were declared hostile and provided no credible testimony, material witnesses failed to appear despite summons, and only one witness (Vivek Kumar) supported the prosecution's account of recovering fifteen fake Rs.500 notes from the accused at the Indo-Nepal border. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case