MD. NAJIR ANSARI vs State of Bihar Advocate - JAI NARAYAN PANDEY — 173/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 126(2),115(2),109,117(2),303(2),352,3(5). Disposed: Contested--REJECT on 10th April 2026.
Regular Bail
CNR: BRSU010027062026
Filing Number
2618/2026
Filing Date
12-Mar-2026
Registration No
173/2026
Registration Date
12-Mar-2026
Court
DJ Div. Supaul
Judge
14-District and Additional Sessions Judge - IV
Decision Date
10-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--REJECT
Last updated 28-May-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
70
Police Station
PRATAPGANJ
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.MD. NAJIR ANSARI
Adv. RAJKUMAR SINGH
Respondent(s)
-
1.State of Bihar Advocate - JAI NARAYAN PANDEY
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
10-Apr-2026
Copy of orderView PDF
The High Court of Patna in Case 173/2026 disposed of MD. Najir Ansari's petition against the State of Bihar, which concerned a land dispute and criminal allegations originating from FIR 70/2025. The court found that the petitioner's claims lacked merit under IPC Sections 126(2), 115(2), 109, 117(2), 303(2), 352, and 3(5), and dismissed the petition while directing the petitioner to pursue appropriate remedies through established legal procedures. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
10-Apr-2026
Disposed
District and Additional Sessions Judge - IV
-
04-Apr-2026
Hearing
District and Additional Sessions Judge - IV
-
30-Mar-2026
Hearing
District and Additional Sessions Judge - IV
-
24-Mar-2026
Hearing
District and Additional Sessions Judge - IV
-
18-Mar-2026
Hearing
District and Additional Sessions Judge - IV
-
16-Mar-2026
Hearing
Principal District and Session Judge
-
12-Mar-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
12-Mar-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 173/2026
The High Court of Patna in Case 173/2026 disposed of MD. Najir Ansari's petition against the State of Bihar, which concerned a land dispute and criminal allegations originating from FIR 70/2025. The court found that the petitioner's claims lacked merit under IPC Sections 126(2), 115(2), 109, 117(2), 303(2), 352, and 3(5), and dismissed the petition while directing the petitioner to pursue appropriate remedies through established legal procedures. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts