NITISH KUMAR vs State of Bihar Advocate - JAI NARAYAN PANDEY — 399/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 126(2),115,117(2),352,3(5). Disposed: Contested--REJECT on 09th April 2026.

Anticipatory Bail

CNR: BRSU010026852026

Case disposed

Filing Number

2597/2026

Filing Date

12-03-2026

Registration No

399/2026

Registration Date

12-03-2026

Court

DJ Div. Supaul

Judge

21-District and Additional Sessions Judge - V

Decision Date

09th April 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--REJECT

FIR Details

FIR Number

203

Police Station

BIRPUR

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 126(2),115,117(2),352,3(5)
Arms Act Section 25(1-B)A,26,35

Petitioner(s)

NITISH KUMAR

Adv. BHANU KUMAR PATHAK

Respondent(s)

State of Bihar Advocate - JAI NARAYAN PANDEY

Hearing History

Judge: 21-District and Additional Sessions Judge - V

09-04-2026

Disposed

06-04-2026

HEARING

04-04-2026

HEARING

30-03-2026

HEARING

19-03-2026

HEARING

Final Orders / Judgements

09-04-2026
Copy of order

Case 399/2026 Summary The District & Additional Sessions Judge, Supaul, rejected Nitish Kumar's anticipatory bail application in connection with PS Case No. 203/2025 involving a quarrel over money transactions. The court found that Kumar's name was disclosed by apprehended co-accused Dilkhush Kumar and Randhir Kumar, the investigation remained pending requiring custodial interrogation, and Kumar had a prior criminal antecedent under the Arms Act (Raghopur PS case 08/2022), warranting his detention. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case 399/2026 Summary The District & Additional Sessions Judge, Supaul, rejected Nitish Kumar's anticipatory bail application in connection with PS Case No. 203/2025 involving a quarrel over money transactions. The court found that Kumar's name was disclosed by apprehended co-accused Dilkhush Kumar and Randhir Kumar, the investigation remained pending requiring custodial interrogation, and Kumar had a prior criminal antecedent under the Arms Act (Raghopur PS case 08/2022), warranting his detention. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

DJ Div. Supaul All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case