KISHOR KUMAR CHAUDHARY vs State of Bihar Advocate - JAI NARAYAN PANDEY — 396/2026
Case under Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act 2018 Section 30A. Disposed: Contested--REJECT on 07th April 2026.
Anticipatory Bail
CNR: BRSU010026392026
Filing Number
2554/2026
Filing Date
10-Mar-2026
Registration No
396/2026
Registration Date
10-Mar-2026
Court
DJ Div. Supaul
Judge
19-Special Judge, Excise Court-I
Decision Date
07-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--REJECT
Last updated 14-Jun-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
58
Police Station
PIPRA
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.KISHOR KUMAR CHAUDHARY
Adv. UNKNOWN
Respondent(s)
-
1.State of Bihar Advocate - JAI NARAYAN PANDEY
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
07-Apr-2026
Copy of orderView PDF
Case Summary: 396/2026 Decision: The court rejected Kishore Kumar Chaudhary's anticipatory bail application. Police recovered 486 liters of illegal liquor from a car during a checkpoint operation on 16.02.2026, and the accused fled upon seeing police forces. The court found sufficient evidence supporting charges under the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act 2016, with witnesses corroborating the seizure, and determined the case remained under investigation, making anticipatory bail inappropriate. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
07-Apr-2026
Disposed
Special Judge, Excise Court-I
-
06-Apr-2026
Hearing
Special Judge, Excise Court-I
-
01-Apr-2026
Hearing
Special Judge, Excise Court-I
-
26-Mar-2026
Hearing
Special Judge, Excise Court-I
-
19-Mar-2026
Hearing
Special Judge, Excise Court-I
-
16-Mar-2026
Hearing
Principal District and Session Judge
-
11-Mar-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
10-Mar-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 396/2026
Case Summary: 396/2026 Decision: The court rejected Kishore Kumar Chaudhary's anticipatory bail application. Police recovered 486 liters of illegal liquor from a car during a checkpoint operation on 16.02.2026, and the accused fled upon seeing police forces. The court found sufficient evidence supporting charges under the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act 2016, with witnesses corroborating the seizure, and determined the case remained under investigation, making anticipatory bail inappropriate. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts