DINBANDHU KUMAR vs State of Bihar Advocate - JAI NARAYAN PANDEY — 392/2026
Case under Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act 2018 Section 30A. Disposed: Contested--REJECT on 21st April 2026.
Anticipatory Bail
CNR: BRSU010025632026
Filing Number
2479/2026
Filing Date
09-Mar-2026
Registration No
392/2026
Registration Date
09-Mar-2026
Court
DJ Div. Supaul
Judge
15-Special Judge, Excise Court-II
Decision Date
21-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--REJECT
Last updated 25-Apr-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
106
Police Station
Madya Nished / Excise Simrahi
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.DINBANDHU KUMAR
Adv. UNKNOWN
Respondent(s)
-
1.State of Bihar Advocate - JAI NARAYAN PANDEY
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
21-Apr-2026
Copy of orderView PDF
Summary The court rejected the anticipatory bail application of Dinabandhu Kumar in a case registered under Section 30(A) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2018. The court found that 120 liters of illicit liquor was seized from a vehicle (Reg. BR-19C-9886) owned by the accused, with incriminating evidence and witness statements establishing his involvement in the offense, making him unsuitable for bail at this stage. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
21-Apr-2026
Disposed
Special Judge, Excise Court-II
-
20-Apr-2026
Hearing
Special Judge, Excise Court-II
-
16-Apr-2026
Hearing
Special Judge, Excise Court-II
-
08-Apr-2026
Hearing
Special Judge, Excise Court-II
-
02-Apr-2026
Hearing
Special Judge, Excise Court-II
-
13-Mar-2026
Hearing
Special Judge, Excise Court-II
-
10-Mar-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
09-Mar-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 392/2026
Summary The court rejected the anticipatory bail application of Dinabandhu Kumar in a case registered under Section 30(A) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2018. The court found that 120 liters of illicit liquor was seized from a vehicle (Reg. BR-19C-9886) owned by the accused, with incriminating evidence and witness statements establishing his involvement in the offense, making him unsuitable for bail at this stage. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts