HEERALAL KAMAT AND OTHERS vs State of Bihar Advocate - JAI NARAYAN PANDEY — 389/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 126(2),115(1),109(1),303(2),3(5). Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 01st April 2026.

Anticipatory Bail

CNR: BRSU010025482026

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

2464/2026

Filing Date

09-03-2026

Registration No

389/2026

Registration Date

09-03-2026

Court

DJ Div. Supaul

Judge

20-District and Additional Sessions Judge - VIII

Decision Date

01st April 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

FIR Details

FIR Number

4

Police Station

RAJESWARI

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 126(2),115(1),109(1),303(2),3(5)

Petitioner(s)

HEERALAL KAMAT AND OTHERS

Adv. NAND KISHORE YADAV

Respondent(s)

State of Bihar Advocate - JAI NARAYAN PANDEY

Hearing History

Judge: 20-District and Additional Sessions Judge - VIII

01-04-2026

Disposed

25-03-2026

HEARING

13-03-2026

HEARING

10-03-2026

HEARING

Final Orders / Judgements

01-04-2026
Copy of order
01-04-2026
Copy of order

Court Decision Summary The Additional Sessions Court, Supraul (Bihar) granted interim bail to the accused Heeralal Kamat and Jiralal Kamat in a case involving charges under IPC Sections 126(2), 115(2), 118(2), 109(1), 303(2), and 3(5). The court found that while the FIR alleged a violent attack on January 10, 2026, the injuries were found to be of a simple nature upon medical examination, and there was no prior criminal history against the accused. The court imposed bail conditions requiring personal bonds of Rs. 10,000 each with two sureties of equal amount, and mandated the accused's regular court appearance and cooperation in the judicial process. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Court Decision Summary The Additional Sessions Court, Supraul (Bihar) granted interim bail to the accused Heeralal Kamat and Jiralal Kamat in a case involving charges under IPC Sections 126(2), 115(2), 118(2), 109(1), 303(2), and 3(5). The court found that while the FIR alleged a violent attack on January 10, 2026, the injuries were found to be of a simple nature upon medical examination, and there was no prior criminal history against the accused. The court imposed bail conditions requiring personal bonds of Rs. 10,000 each with two sureties of equal amount, and mandated the accused's regular court appearance and cooperation in the judicial process. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

DJ Div. Supaul All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case