HEERALAL KAMAT AND OTHERS vs State of Bihar Advocate - JAI NARAYAN PANDEY — 389/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 126(2),115(1),109(1),303(2),3(5). Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 01st April 2026.
Anticipatory Bail
CNR: BRSU010025482026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
2464/2026
Filing Date
09-03-2026
Registration No
389/2026
Registration Date
09-03-2026
Court
DJ Div. Supaul
Judge
20-District and Additional Sessions Judge - VIII
Decision Date
01st April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED
FIR Details
FIR Number
4
Police Station
RAJESWARI
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
HEERALAL KAMAT AND OTHERS
Adv. NAND KISHORE YADAV
Respondent(s)
State of Bihar Advocate - JAI NARAYAN PANDEY
Hearing History
Judge: 20-District and Additional Sessions Judge - VIII
Disposed
HEARING
HEARING
HEARING
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 01-04-2026 | Disposed | |
| 25-03-2026 | HEARING | |
| 13-03-2026 | HEARING | |
| 10-03-2026 | HEARING |
Final Orders / Judgements
Court Decision Summary The Additional Sessions Court, Supraul (Bihar) granted interim bail to the accused Heeralal Kamat and Jiralal Kamat in a case involving charges under IPC Sections 126(2), 115(2), 118(2), 109(1), 303(2), and 3(5). The court found that while the FIR alleged a violent attack on January 10, 2026, the injuries were found to be of a simple nature upon medical examination, and there was no prior criminal history against the accused. The court imposed bail conditions requiring personal bonds of Rs. 10,000 each with two sureties of equal amount, and mandated the accused's regular court appearance and cooperation in the judicial process. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Court Decision Summary The Additional Sessions Court, Supraul (Bihar) granted interim bail to the accused Heeralal Kamat and Jiralal Kamat in a case involving charges under IPC Sections 126(2), 115(2), 118(2), 109(1), 303(2), and 3(5). The court found that while the FIR alleged a violent attack on January 10, 2026, the injuries were found to be of a simple nature upon medical examination, and there was no prior criminal history against the accused. The court imposed bail conditions requiring personal bonds of Rs. 10,000 each with two sureties of equal amount, and mandated the accused's regular court appearance and cooperation in the judicial process. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts