CHHEDAN SADA vs State of Bihar Advocate - JAI NARAYAN PANDEY — 387/2026
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 147,148,149,341,323,324,325,379,307. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 09th April 2026.
Anticipatory Bail
CNR: BRSU010025412026
Filing Number
2457/2026
Filing Date
09-Mar-2026
Registration No
387/2026
Registration Date
09-Mar-2026
Court
DJ Div. Supaul
Judge
21-District and Additional Sessions Judge - V
Decision Date
09-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED
Last updated 25-Apr-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
588
Police Station
SUPAUL
Year
2019
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.CHHEDAN SADA
Adv. LALAN KUMAR
Respondent(s)
-
1.State of Bihar Advocate - JAI NARAYAN PANDEY
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
09-Apr-2026
Copy of orderView PDF
Summary: The District & Additional Sessions Judge, Supaul granted anticipatory bail to accused Chhedan Sada in a case involving alleged assault on the informant and family members during a land dispute (FIR 588/2019). The court found that despite six years having passed since the FIR was registered on 29.08.2019, investigation remained incomplete in violation of Supreme Court mandate; the investigating officer confirmed custodial interrogation was unnecessary and made no arrest warrant prayer. The court noted the assault allegation involved only a leg fracture (non-vital body part) with no repeated assault, hence approved bail of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties on conditions including cooperation with investigation, providing contact details, and non-interference with witnesses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
09-Apr-2026
Disposed
District and Additional Sessions Judge - V
-
25-Mar-2026
Hearing
District and Additional Sessions Judge - V
-
13-Mar-2026
Hearing
District and Additional Sessions Judge - V
-
10-Mar-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
09-Mar-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 387/2026
Summary: The District & Additional Sessions Judge, Supaul granted anticipatory bail to accused Chhedan Sada in a case involving alleged assault on the informant and family members during a land dispute (FIR 588/2019). The court found that despite six years having passed since the FIR was registered on 29.08.2019, investigation remained incomplete in violation of Supreme Court mandate; the investigating officer confirmed custodial interrogation was unnecessary and made no arrest warrant prayer. The court noted the assault allegation involved only a leg fracture (non-vital body part) with no repeated assault, hence approved bail of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties on conditions including cooperation with investigation, providing contact details, and non-interference with witnesses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts