CHHEDAN SADA vs State of Bihar Advocate - JAI NARAYAN PANDEY — 387/2026
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 147,148,149,341,323,324,325,379,307. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 09th April 2026.
Anticipatory Bail
CNR: BRSU010025412026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
2457/2026
Filing Date
09-03-2026
Registration No
387/2026
Registration Date
09-03-2026
Court
DJ Div. Supaul
Judge
21-District and Additional Sessions Judge - V
Decision Date
09th April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED
FIR Details
FIR Number
588
Police Station
SUPAUL
Year
2019
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
CHHEDAN SADA
Adv. LALAN KUMAR
Respondent(s)
State of Bihar Advocate - JAI NARAYAN PANDEY
Hearing History
Judge: 21-District and Additional Sessions Judge - V
Disposed
HEARING
HEARING
HEARING
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 09-04-2026 | Disposed | |
| 25-03-2026 | HEARING | |
| 13-03-2026 | HEARING | |
| 10-03-2026 | HEARING |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary: The District & Additional Sessions Judge, Supaul granted anticipatory bail to accused Chhedan Sada in a case involving alleged assault on the informant and family members during a land dispute (FIR 588/2019). The court found that despite six years having passed since the FIR was registered on 29.08.2019, investigation remained incomplete in violation of Supreme Court mandate; the investigating officer confirmed custodial interrogation was unnecessary and made no arrest warrant prayer. The court noted the assault allegation involved only a leg fracture (non-vital body part) with no repeated assault, hence approved bail of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties on conditions including cooperation with investigation, providing contact details, and non-interference with witnesses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: The District & Additional Sessions Judge, Supaul granted anticipatory bail to accused Chhedan Sada in a case involving alleged assault on the informant and family members during a land dispute (FIR 588/2019). The court found that despite six years having passed since the FIR was registered on 29.08.2019, investigation remained incomplete in violation of Supreme Court mandate; the investigating officer confirmed custodial interrogation was unnecessary and made no arrest warrant prayer. The court noted the assault allegation involved only a leg fracture (non-vital body part) with no repeated assault, hence approved bail of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties on conditions including cooperation with investigation, providing contact details, and non-interference with witnesses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts