CHHEDAN SADA vs State of Bihar Advocate - JAI NARAYAN PANDEY — 387/2026

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 147,148,149,341,323,324,325,379,307. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 09th April 2026.

Anticipatory Bail

CNR: BRSU010025412026

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

2457/2026

Filing Date

09-03-2026

Registration No

387/2026

Registration Date

09-03-2026

Court

DJ Div. Supaul

Judge

21-District and Additional Sessions Judge - V

Decision Date

09th April 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

FIR Details

FIR Number

588

Police Station

SUPAUL

Year

2019

Acts & Sections

Indian Penal Code Section 147,148,149,341,323,324,325,379,307

Petitioner(s)

CHHEDAN SADA

Adv. LALAN KUMAR

Respondent(s)

State of Bihar Advocate - JAI NARAYAN PANDEY

Hearing History

Judge: 21-District and Additional Sessions Judge - V

09-04-2026

Disposed

25-03-2026

HEARING

13-03-2026

HEARING

10-03-2026

HEARING

Final Orders / Judgements

09-04-2026
Copy of order

Summary: The District & Additional Sessions Judge, Supaul granted anticipatory bail to accused Chhedan Sada in a case involving alleged assault on the informant and family members during a land dispute (FIR 588/2019). The court found that despite six years having passed since the FIR was registered on 29.08.2019, investigation remained incomplete in violation of Supreme Court mandate; the investigating officer confirmed custodial interrogation was unnecessary and made no arrest warrant prayer. The court noted the assault allegation involved only a leg fracture (non-vital body part) with no repeated assault, hence approved bail of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties on conditions including cooperation with investigation, providing contact details, and non-interference with witnesses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The District & Additional Sessions Judge, Supaul granted anticipatory bail to accused Chhedan Sada in a case involving alleged assault on the informant and family members during a land dispute (FIR 588/2019). The court found that despite six years having passed since the FIR was registered on 29.08.2019, investigation remained incomplete in violation of Supreme Court mandate; the investigating officer confirmed custodial interrogation was unnecessary and made no arrest warrant prayer. The court noted the assault allegation involved only a leg fracture (non-vital body part) with no repeated assault, hence approved bail of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties on conditions including cooperation with investigation, providing contact details, and non-interference with witnesses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

DJ Div. Supaul All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case