DASHRATH PASWAN AND OTHERS vs State of Bihar Advocate - JAI NARAYAN PANDEY — 373/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 137(2),87,351(2),3(5). Disposed: Contested--PARTLY ALLOWED on 20th May 2026.
Anticipatory Bail
CNR: BRSU010024092026
Filing Number
2329/2026
Filing Date
02-03-2026
Registration No
373/2026
Registration Date
02-03-2026
Court
DJ Div. Supaul
Judge
16-District and Additional Sessions Judge - VI-cum-Special Court POCSO
Decision Date
20th May 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--PARTLY ALLOWED
FIR Details
FIR Number
426
Police Station
PIPRA
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
DASHRATH PASWAN AND OTHERS
Adv. BIMLESH KUMAR
Respondent(s)
State of Bihar Advocate - JAI NARAYAN PANDEY
Hearing History
Judge: 16-District and Additional Sessions Judge - VI-cum-Special Court POCSO
Disposed
HEARING
HEARING
HEARING
HEARING
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 20-05-2026 | Disposed |
| 16-05-2026 | HEARING |
| 13-05-2026 | HEARING |
| 05-05-2026 | HEARING |
| 20-04-2026 | HEARING |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: 373/2026 Court Decision: The court partially granted the anticipatory bail application. Bail was granted to Dashrath Paswan and Doulti Devi on furnishing a bond of ₹10,000 with two sureties, subject to Section 482(2) BNSS conditions. However, Laltu Kumar's anticipatory bail was rejected as the court found insufficient grounds to grant him bail based on the evidence and statements recorded. Key Facts: The case involves allegations of kidnapping of a 16-year-old girl (victim born 08.05.2008) who allegedly eloped and married Laltu Kumar. The victim's statement under Section 183 BNSS confirmed she willingly married Laltu on 18.12.2025 and denied any abduction, contradicting the FIR charges under Sections 137(2), 87, 351(2), and 3(5) IPC. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: 373/2026 Court Decision: The court partially granted the anticipatory bail application. Bail was granted to Dashrath Paswan and Doulti Devi on furnishing a bond of ₹10,000 with two sureties, subject to Section 482(2) BNSS conditions. However, Laltu Kumar's anticipatory bail was rejected as the court found insufficient grounds to grant him bail based on the evidence and statements recorded. Key Facts: The case involves allegations of kidnapping of a 16-year-old girl (victim born 08.05.2008) who allegedly eloped and married Laltu Kumar. The victim's statement under Section 183 BNSS confirmed she willingly married Laltu on 18.12.2025 and denied any abduction, contradicting the FIR charges under Sections 137(2), 87, 351(2), and 3(5) IPC. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts