MEHDI ALAM vs State of Bihar Advocate - JAI NARAYAN PANDEY — 164/2026

Case 164/2026 Summary The Sessions Judge, Supaul rejected Mehadi Alam's bail application in a case involving coordinated thefts at three jewelry shops. The court found that Alam's confessional statement was corroborated by recovery of stolen articles (silver and gold jewelry, weighing machines) from accomplices' premises, establishing serious charges under BNS sections 334(1) and 307. Given the gravity of allegations, Alam's involvement in two prior criminal cases, the investigation's preliminary stage, and risk of evidence tampering, the court determined bail was unjustified. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.