RIJAULLA vs State of Bihar Advocate - JAI NARAYAN PANDEY — 163/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 96,324(4),3(5). Disposed: Contested--REJECT on 19th March 2026.

Case disposed

Regular Bail

CNR: BRSU010024072026

Filing Number

2327/2026

Filing Date

02-Mar-2026

Registration No

163/2026

Registration Date

02-Mar-2026

Court

DJ Div. Supaul

Judge

7-Principal District and Session Judge

Decision Date

19-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--REJECT

Last updated 28-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

67

Police Station

BIRPUR

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 96,324(4),3(5)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.RIJAULLA

    Adv. SANJAY KUMAR SINGH

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State of Bihar Advocate - JAI NARAYAN PANDEY

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 19-Mar-2026

    Copy of orderView PDF

    Case 163/2026 Summary: The Sessions Court rejected bail applications filed by Rijaullah and Naresh Ray, who were accused of kidnapping two minor girls (aged 14 and 15) from their home on 07.02.2026. The girls were recovered from the Indo-Nepal Border by Railway Police, and witness statements indicated the accused enticed and kidnapped them for marriage purposes. The court found the allegations serious, the investigation in primary stage, and the risk of trafficking significant, making bail inappropriate at this stage. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 19-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal District and Session Judge

  4. 12-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    Principal District and Session Judge

  5. 06-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 02-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 163/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case 163/2026 Summary: The Sessions Court rejected bail applications filed by Rijaullah and Naresh Ray, who were accused of kidnapping two minor girls (aged 14 and 15) from their home on 07.02.2026. The girls were recovered from the Indo-Nepal Border by Railway Police, and witness statements indicated the accused enticed and kidnapped them for marriage purposes. The court found the allegations serious, the investigation in primary stage, and the risk of trafficking significant, making bail inappropriate at this stage. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case