RAMCHANDRA YADAV AND OTHERS vs State of Bihar Advocate - JAI NARAYAN PANDEY — 368/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 126(2),115(2),117(2),109,303(2),351(2),351(3),352,3(5). Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 04th April 2026.
Anticipatory Bail
CNR: BRSU010023782026
Filing Number
2298/2026
Filing Date
28-Feb-2026
Registration No
368/2026
Registration Date
28-Feb-2026
Court
DJ Div. Supaul
Judge
7-Principal District and Session Judge
Decision Date
04-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED
Last updated 28-May-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
235
Police Station
NIRMALI
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.RAMCHANDRA YADAV AND OTHERS
Adv. BHANU KUMAR PATHAK
Respondent(s)
-
1.State of Bihar Advocate - JAI NARAYAN PANDEY
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
04-Apr-2026
Copy of orderView PDF
The court allowed the anticipatory bail application of six accused persons who faced charges under multiple sections of BNS for an alleged assault and robbery during a land dispute. The court found that while the petitioners' names appeared in the FIR, there were no specific allegations against them for causing injury, the main allegation centered on accused Inardeo Yadav, and police found no evidence of the alleged snatching of jewelry or cash. The court ordered their release on bail bonds of Rs. 20,000 each with two sureties of equal amount, subject to conditions under section 482 BNSS. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
04-Apr-2026
Disposed
Principal District and Session Judge
-
26-Mar-2026
Hearing
Principal District and Session Judge
-
24-Mar-2026
Hearing
Principal District and Session Judge
-
16-Mar-2026
Hearing
Principal District and Session Judge
-
12-Mar-2026
Hearing
Principal District and Session Judge
-
02-Mar-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
28-Feb-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 368/2026
The court allowed the anticipatory bail application of six accused persons who faced charges under multiple sections of BNS for an alleged assault and robbery during a land dispute. The court found that while the petitioners' names appeared in the FIR, there were no specific allegations against them for causing injury, the main allegation centered on accused Inardeo Yadav, and police found no evidence of the alleged snatching of jewelry or cash. The court ordered their release on bail bonds of Rs. 20,000 each with two sureties of equal amount, subject to conditions under section 482 BNSS. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts