RUPESH KUMAR vs State of Bihar Advocate - JAI NARAYAN PANDEY — 152/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 109(1),3(5). Disposed: Contested--REJECT on 25th March 2026.
Regular Bail
CNR: BRSU010023472026
Filing Number
2270/2026
Filing Date
27-Feb-2026
Registration No
152/2026
Registration Date
27-Feb-2026
Court
DJ Div. Supaul
Judge
7-Principal District and Session Judge
Decision Date
25-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--REJECT
Last updated 14-Jun-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
567
Police Station
TRIBENIGANJ
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.RUPESH KUMAR
Adv. SANJAY KUMAR SINGH
Respondent(s)
-
1.State of Bihar Advocate - JAI NARAYAN PANDEY
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
25-Mar-2026
Copy of orderView PDF
Case Summary: BA-152/2026 (Rupesh Kumar v. State of Bihar) The Sessions Judge rejected Rupesh Kumar's bail application in a contract killing case. Kumar was accused of being hired by Brajesh Kumar (who had an illicit affair with victim Shashi Ranjan Jaiswal's wife) as a contract killer to shoot the victim for ₹1,20,000. Investigation revealed incriminating evidence including call records between co-conspirators, recovery of firearms and ammunition matching the crime, five gunshot injuries on the victim, and Kumar's involvement in a related arms case. The court found the allegations serious with strong evidence and risk of witness tampering, rendering bail inappropriate. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
25-Mar-2026
Disposed
Principal District and Session Judge
-
16-Mar-2026
Hearing
Principal District and Session Judge
-
28-Feb-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
27-Feb-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 152/2026
Case Summary: BA-152/2026 (Rupesh Kumar v. State of Bihar) The Sessions Judge rejected Rupesh Kumar's bail application in a contract killing case. Kumar was accused of being hired by Brajesh Kumar (who had an illicit affair with victim Shashi Ranjan Jaiswal's wife) as a contract killer to shoot the victim for ₹1,20,000. Investigation revealed incriminating evidence including call records between co-conspirators, recovery of firearms and ammunition matching the crime, five gunshot injuries on the victim, and Kumar's involvement in a related arms case. The court found the allegations serious with strong evidence and risk of witness tampering, rendering bail inappropriate. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts