AMRUL AND OTHERS vs State of Bihar Advocate - JAI NARAYAN PANDEY — 359/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 191(2),191(3),190,115(2),118(1),126(2),109(1). Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 16th March 2026.
Anticipatory Bail
CNR: BRSU010023122026
Filing Number
2242/2026
Filing Date
26-02-2026
Registration No
359/2026
Registration Date
26-02-2026
Court
DJ Div. Supaul
Judge
7-Principal District and Session Judge
Decision Date
16th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED
FIR Details
FIR Number
29
Police Station
LALIT GRAM
Year
2004
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
AMRUL AND OTHERS
Adv. MD RAZI AHMAD
Respondent(s)
State of Bihar Advocate - JAI NARAYAN PANDEY
Hearing History
Judge: 7-Principal District and Session Judge
Disposed
HEARING
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 16-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 27-02-2026 | HEARING |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary of Case 359/2026 The court granted bail to the five accused (Amrul, Mohammad Azan, Mohammad Malik, Shamsher, and Habbo) in a case involving charges under IPC sections 191(2), 191(3), 190, 115(2), 118(1), 126(2), and 109(1), arising from an incident on July 17, 2024, at a Muharram gathering where a sword fight occurred resulting in injury. The court found that the accused were primary accused in a counter-case (Lalitganj PS Case 26/2024), both parties had reached a settlement with a reconciliation deed, and the specific allegation of assault with a weapon was directed only at one accused (Shamsher), not all. Bail was granted on the condition of furnishing security of Rs. 15,000 with two sureties of equal amount, returnable within 15 days. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary of Case 359/2026 The court granted bail to the five accused (Amrul, Mohammad Azan, Mohammad Malik, Shamsher, and Habbo) in a case involving charges under IPC sections 191(2), 191(3), 190, 115(2), 118(1), 126(2), and 109(1), arising from an incident on July 17, 2024, at a Muharram gathering where a sword fight occurred resulting in injury. The court found that the accused were primary accused in a counter-case (Lalitganj PS Case 26/2024), both parties had reached a settlement with a reconciliation deed, and the specific allegation of assault with a weapon was directed only at one accused (Shamsher), not all. Bail was granted on the condition of furnishing security of Rs. 15,000 with two sureties of equal amount, returnable within 15 days. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts