AMRUL AND OTHERS vs State of Bihar Advocate - JAI NARAYAN PANDEY — 359/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 191(2),191(3),190,115(2),118(1),126(2),109(1). Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 16th March 2026.

Anticipatory Bail

CNR: BRSU010023122026

Case disposed

Filing Number

2242/2026

Filing Date

26-02-2026

Registration No

359/2026

Registration Date

26-02-2026

Court

DJ Div. Supaul

Judge

7-Principal District and Session Judge

Decision Date

16th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

FIR Details

FIR Number

29

Police Station

LALIT GRAM

Year

2004

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 191(2),191(3),190,115(2),118(1),126(2),109(1)

Petitioner(s)

AMRUL AND OTHERS

Adv. MD RAZI AHMAD

Respondent(s)

State of Bihar Advocate - JAI NARAYAN PANDEY

Hearing History

Judge: 7-Principal District and Session Judge

16-03-2026

Disposed

27-02-2026

HEARING

Final Orders / Judgements

16-03-2026
Copy of order

Summary of Case 359/2026 The court granted bail to the five accused (Amrul, Mohammad Azan, Mohammad Malik, Shamsher, and Habbo) in a case involving charges under IPC sections 191(2), 191(3), 190, 115(2), 118(1), 126(2), and 109(1), arising from an incident on July 17, 2024, at a Muharram gathering where a sword fight occurred resulting in injury. The court found that the accused were primary accused in a counter-case (Lalitganj PS Case 26/2024), both parties had reached a settlement with a reconciliation deed, and the specific allegation of assault with a weapon was directed only at one accused (Shamsher), not all. Bail was granted on the condition of furnishing security of Rs. 15,000 with two sureties of equal amount, returnable within 15 days. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary of Case 359/2026 The court granted bail to the five accused (Amrul, Mohammad Azan, Mohammad Malik, Shamsher, and Habbo) in a case involving charges under IPC sections 191(2), 191(3), 190, 115(2), 118(1), 126(2), and 109(1), arising from an incident on July 17, 2024, at a Muharram gathering where a sword fight occurred resulting in injury. The court found that the accused were primary accused in a counter-case (Lalitganj PS Case 26/2024), both parties had reached a settlement with a reconciliation deed, and the specific allegation of assault with a weapon was directed only at one accused (Shamsher), not all. Bail was granted on the condition of furnishing security of Rs. 15,000 with two sureties of equal amount, returnable within 15 days. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

DJ Div. Supaul All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case