MD. BECHAN AND OTHERS vs State of Bihar Advocate - JAI NARAYAN PANDEY — 358/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 191(2),191(3),115(2),118(1),126(2),109(1). Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 16th March 2026.

Case disposed

Anticipatory Bail

CNR: BRSU010023092026

Filing Number

2239/2026

Filing Date

26-Feb-2026

Registration No

358/2026

Registration Date

26-Feb-2026

Court

DJ Div. Supaul

Judge

7-Principal District and Session Judge

Decision Date

16-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

Last updated 14-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

26

Police Station

LALIT GRAM

Year

2024

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 191(2),191(3),115(2),118(1),126(2),109(1)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.MD. BECHAN AND OTHERS

    Adv. MD NASIR UDDIN

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State of Bihar Advocate - JAI NARAYAN PANDEY

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 16-Mar-2026

    Copy of orderView PDF

    The court granted anticipatory bail to the three accused petitioners (MD. Bechan, Nehal, and Shafiq Urf Kari) in connection with FIR No. 26/2024 under various sections of the IPC. The court found that a settlement had been reached between the parties with a compromise petition filed, and the accused had no prior criminal history, making them entitled to bail. The accused were released on bail with conditions including a personal bond of ₹15,000 each and two sureties of equal amount, with the requirement to appear before the lower court within 15 days or surrender to police as directed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 16-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal District and Session Judge

  4. 27-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 26-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 358/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The court granted anticipatory bail to the three accused petitioners (MD. Bechan, Nehal, and Shafiq Urf Kari) in connection with FIR No. 26/2024 under various sections of the IPC. The court found that a settlement had been reached between the parties with a compromise petition filed, and the accused had no prior criminal history, making them entitled to bail. The accused were released on bail with conditions including a personal bond of ₹15,000 each and two sureties of equal amount, with the requirement to appear before the lower court within 15 days or surrender to police as directed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case