SANJAY DAGRU KALE vs State of Bihar Advocate - JAI NARAYAN PANDEY — 142/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 334(1),307. Disposed: Contested--REJECT on 24th March 2026.

Case disposed

Regular Bail

CNR: BRSU010022682026

Filing Number

2198/2026

Filing Date

25-Feb-2026

Registration No

142/2026

Registration Date

25-Feb-2026

Court

DJ Div. Supaul

Judge

7-Principal District and Session Judge

Decision Date

24-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--REJECT

Last updated 28-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

25

Police Station

KISHANPUR

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 334(1),307

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SANJAY DAGRU KALE

    Adv. SANJAY KUMAR SINGH

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State of Bihar Advocate - JAI NARAYAN PANDEY

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 24-Mar-2026

    Copy of orderView PDF

    Case Summary: Sanjay Dagru Kale v. State of Bihar (BA-142/2026) The Sessions Judge rejected bail applications for three accused in a theft case involving jewelry stolen from multiple shops on 26-27 January 2026. The court found the allegations serious, noting that accused Mehadi Alam made a confessional statement leading to recovery of stolen items from co-accused Sanjay Dagru Kale's jewelry shop and another accused's house. While Kale and Md. Mumtaj had clean records, the court cited the gravity of the crimes (theft at three shops in one night), corroborating evidence, ongoing investigation, and risk of evidence tampering to deny bail to all three petitioners. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 24-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal District and Session Judge

  4. 17-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    Principal District and Session Judge

  5. 12-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    Principal District and Session Judge

  6. 28-Feb-2026

    Hearing

    Principal District and Session Judge

  7. 26-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  8. 25-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 142/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: Sanjay Dagru Kale v. State of Bihar (BA-142/2026) The Sessions Judge rejected bail applications for three accused in a theft case involving jewelry stolen from multiple shops on 26-27 January 2026. The court found the allegations serious, noting that accused Mehadi Alam made a confessional statement leading to recovery of stolen items from co-accused Sanjay Dagru Kale's jewelry shop and another accused's house. While Kale and Md. Mumtaj had clean records, the court cited the gravity of the crimes (theft at three shops in one night), corroborating evidence, ongoing investigation, and risk of evidence tampering to deny bail to all three petitioners. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case