FIROJ ALAM vs State of Bihar Advocate - JAI NARAYAN PANDEY — 314/2026

Case under Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 Section 8,20(B)(II)(C). Disposed: Contested--REJECT on 26th March 2026.

Anticipatory Bail

CNR: BRSU010021442026

Case disposed

Filing Number

2082/2026

Filing Date

21-02-2026

Registration No

314/2026

Registration Date

21-02-2026

Court

DJ Div. Supaul

Judge

7-Principal District and Session Judge

Decision Date

26th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--REJECT

FIR Details

FIR Number

86

Police Station

BIRPUR

Year

2024

Acts & Sections

N.D.P.S.Act Section 8,20(B)(II)(C)

Petitioner(s)

FIROJ ALAM

Adv. UNKNOWN

Respondent(s)

State of Bihar Advocate - JAI NARAYAN PANDEY

Hearing History

Judge: 7-Principal District and Session Judge

26-03-2026

Disposed

12-03-2026

HEARING

23-02-2026

HEARING

Final Orders / Judgements

26-03-2026
Copy of order

Case Summary: The Court of Sessions Judge, Supaul rejected Firoz Alam's anticipatory bail application in an NDPS Act case. Alam was allegedly part of a three-person smuggling operation attempting to bring 93 KG of illicit ganja from Nepal into India; co-accused Raushan Kumar Paswan was arrested and confessed to Alam's involvement. The court found the charges serious given the large commercial-quantity seizure, Alam's prior NDPS conviction, and custodial interrogation needs, rendering him ineligible for anticipatory bail. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: The Court of Sessions Judge, Supaul rejected Firoz Alam's anticipatory bail application in an NDPS Act case. Alam was allegedly part of a three-person smuggling operation attempting to bring 93 KG of illicit ganja from Nepal into India; co-accused Raushan Kumar Paswan was arrested and confessed to Alam's involvement. The court found the charges serious given the large commercial-quantity seizure, Alam's prior NDPS conviction, and custodial interrogation needs, rendering him ineligible for anticipatory bail. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

DJ Div. Supaul All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case