RAJA SINGH vs State of Bihar — 127/2026

Case under Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act 2018 Section 126(2),115(2),352,351(2),308(2),308(5),3(5). Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 26th March 2026.

Regular Bail

CNR: BRSU010020732026

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

2012/2026

Filing Date

20-02-2026

Registration No

127/2026

Registration Date

20-02-2026

Court

DJ Div. Supaul

Judge

6-District and Additional Sessions Judge-II

Decision Date

26th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

FIR Details

FIR Number

613

Police Station

SUPAUL

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

BIHAR PROHIBITION AND EXCISE ACT 2018 Section 126(2),115(2),352,351(2),308(2),308(5),3(5)

Petitioner(s)

RAJA SINGH

Adv. MAHENDRA PRASAD SAH

Respondent(s)

State of Bihar

Hearing History

Judge: 6-District and Additional Sessions Judge-II

26-03-2026

Disposed

23-03-2026

HEARING

17-03-2026

HEARING

10-03-2026

HEARING

24-02-2026

HEARING

Final Orders / Judgements

26-03-2026
Copy of order

Case Summary The Supual Additional Sessions Court (Supual, Bihar) approved bail for two accused, Sanjeev Kumar Yadav and Raja Singh, in FIR No. 613/25 under serious charges including criminal intimidation, extortion, and rioting (BNS Sections 308(2), 308(5), 352, 351(2), 126(2), 115(2), 3(5)). The court found that the accused had been in judicial custody for over three months, no flight risk was apparent, and investigation had substantially progressed with the charge sheet filed. Bail was granted on condition of providing two sureties of Rs. 10,000 each and furnishing a personal bond. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary The Supual Additional Sessions Court (Supual, Bihar) approved bail for two accused, Sanjeev Kumar Yadav and Raja Singh, in FIR No. 613/25 under serious charges including criminal intimidation, extortion, and rioting (BNS Sections 308(2), 308(5), 352, 351(2), 126(2), 115(2), 3(5)). The court found that the accused had been in judicial custody for over three months, no flight risk was apparent, and investigation had substantially progressed with the charge sheet filed. Bail was granted on condition of providing two sureties of Rs. 10,000 each and furnishing a personal bond. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

DJ Div. Supaul All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case