RAJA SINGH vs State of Bihar — 127/2026
Case under Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act 2018 Section 126(2),115(2),352,351(2),308(2),308(5),3(5). Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 26th March 2026.
Regular Bail
CNR: BRSU010020732026
Filing Number
2012/2026
Filing Date
20-Feb-2026
Registration No
127/2026
Registration Date
20-Feb-2026
Court
DJ Div. Supaul
Judge
6-District and Additional Sessions Judge-II
Decision Date
26-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED
Last updated 25-Apr-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
613
Police Station
SUPAUL
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.RAJA SINGH
Adv. MAHENDRA PRASAD SAH
Respondent(s)
-
1.State of Bihar
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
26-Mar-2026
Copy of orderView PDF
Case Summary The Supual Additional Sessions Court (Supual, Bihar) approved bail for two accused, Sanjeev Kumar Yadav and Raja Singh, in FIR No. 613/25 under serious charges including criminal intimidation, extortion, and rioting (BNS Sections 308(2), 308(5), 352, 351(2), 126(2), 115(2), 3(5)). The court found that the accused had been in judicial custody for over three months, no flight risk was apparent, and investigation had substantially progressed with the charge sheet filed. Bail was granted on condition of providing two sureties of Rs. 10,000 each and furnishing a personal bond. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
26-Mar-2026
Disposed
District and Additional Sessions Judge-II
-
23-Mar-2026
Hearing
District and Additional Sessions Judge-II
-
17-Mar-2026
Hearing
District and Additional Sessions Judge-II
-
10-Mar-2026
Hearing
District and Additional Sessions Judge-II
-
24-Feb-2026
Hearing
District and Additional Sessions Judge-II
-
21-Feb-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
20-Feb-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 127/2026
Case Summary The Supual Additional Sessions Court (Supual, Bihar) approved bail for two accused, Sanjeev Kumar Yadav and Raja Singh, in FIR No. 613/25 under serious charges including criminal intimidation, extortion, and rioting (BNS Sections 308(2), 308(5), 352, 351(2), 126(2), 115(2), 3(5)). The court found that the accused had been in judicial custody for over three months, no flight risk was apparent, and investigation had substantially progressed with the charge sheet filed. Bail was granted on condition of providing two sureties of Rs. 10,000 each and furnishing a personal bond. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts