PRAKASH YADAV vs State of Bihar — 126/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 126(2),115(2),74,352,351(2),109(1),3(5). Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 10th April 2026.
Regular Bail
CNR: BRSU010020722026
Filing Number
2011/2026
Filing Date
20-Feb-2026
Registration No
126/2026
Registration Date
20-Feb-2026
Court
DJ Div. Supaul
Judge
7-Principal District and Session Judge
Decision Date
10-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED
Last updated 28-May-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
640
Police Station
SUPAUL
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.PRAKASH YADAV
Adv. SANJAY KUMAR SINGH
Respondent(s)
-
1.State of Bihar
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
10-Apr-2026
Copy of orderView PDF
The Sessions Judge granted bail to Prakash Yadav, who was accused of assaulting a woman and her family members during a violent altercation over a land dispute on December 23, 2025. The court found that despite specific allegations of causing grievous injury and prior criminal involvement, continued detention served no useful purpose given the nearly complete investigation, prolonged custody since January 29, 2026, and the family/land dispute nature of the case. Bail was granted on a bond of Rs. 20,000 with two sureties of equal amount. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
10-Apr-2026
Disposed
Principal District and Session Judge
-
08-Apr-2026
Hearing
Principal District and Session Judge
-
01-Apr-2026
Hearing
Principal District and Session Judge
-
28-Mar-2026
Hearing
Principal District and Session Judge
-
19-Mar-2026
Hearing
Principal District and Session Judge
-
12-Mar-2026
Hearing
Principal District and Session Judge
-
06-Mar-2026
Hearing
Principal District and Session Judge
-
21-Feb-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
20-Feb-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 126/2026
The Sessions Judge granted bail to Prakash Yadav, who was accused of assaulting a woman and her family members during a violent altercation over a land dispute on December 23, 2025. The court found that despite specific allegations of causing grievous injury and prior criminal involvement, continued detention served no useful purpose given the nearly complete investigation, prolonged custody since January 29, 2026, and the family/land dispute nature of the case. Bail was granted on a bond of Rs. 20,000 with two sureties of equal amount. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts