PRAMOD YADAV vs State of Bihar Advocate - JAI NARAYAN PANDEY — 123/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 126(2),115(2),117(2),307,352,351(2),191(1). Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 23rd March 2026.
Regular Bail
CNR: BRSU010020192026
Filing Number
1958/2026
Filing Date
19-02-2026
Registration No
123/2026
Registration Date
19-02-2026
Court
DJ Div. Supaul
Judge
7-Principal District and Session Judge
Decision Date
23rd March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED
FIR Details
FIR Number
214
Police Station
NIRMALI
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
PRAMOD YADAV
Adv. NAGENDRA NARAYAN THAKUR
Respondent(s)
State of Bihar Advocate - JAI NARAYAN PANDEY
Hearing History
Judge: 7-Principal District and Session Judge
Disposed
HEARING
HEARING
HEARING
HEARING
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 23-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 16-03-2026 | HEARING |
| 11-03-2026 | HEARING |
| 28-02-2026 | HEARING |
| 20-02-2026 | HEARING |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: 123/2026 The Sessions Judge, Supaul allowed bail for accused Pramod Yadav, who was charged with robbery, assault, and intimidation in connection with an alleged December 2025 attack where he and others allegedly robbed and assaulted the informant's son. The court granted bail of Rs. 20,000 with two sureties of equal amount, citing prolonged custody (since January 26, 2026), incomplete police investigation (missing injury report, no recovery of stolen articles documented), and other procedural deficiencies as grounds for release. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: 123/2026 The Sessions Judge, Supaul allowed bail for accused Pramod Yadav, who was charged with robbery, assault, and intimidation in connection with an alleged December 2025 attack where he and others allegedly robbed and assaulted the informant's son. The court granted bail of Rs. 20,000 with two sureties of equal amount, citing prolonged custody (since January 26, 2026), incomplete police investigation (missing injury report, no recovery of stolen articles documented), and other procedural deficiencies as grounds for release. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts