NAGESHWAR MEHTA AND OTHERS vs State of Bihar Advocate - JAI NARAYAN PANDEY — 286/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 126(2),115(2),118(1),109(1),351(2),352(2),3(5). Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 06th April 2026.
Anticipatory Bail
CNR: BRSU010019492026
Filing Number
1895/2026
Filing Date
17-Feb-2026
Registration No
286/2026
Registration Date
17-Feb-2026
Court
DJ Div. Supaul
Judge
7-Principal District and Session Judge
Decision Date
06-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED
Last updated 14-Jun-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
161
Police Station
RAJESWARI
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.NAGESHWAR MEHTA AND OTHERS
Adv. UNKNOWN
Respondent(s)
-
1.State of Bihar Advocate - JAI NARAYAN PANDEY
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
06-Apr-2026
Copy of orderView PDF
Case Summary: 286/2026 The District and Sessions Court, Supaul granted bail to petitioners Nageshwar Mehta and Birendr Mehta in a case involving charges under IPC sections 126(2), 115(2), 118(1), 109(1), 351(2), and 352(2)/3(5) (relating to criminal intimidation and assault). The court found the accusations credible based on the informant's statement describing a violent altercation on December 31, 2025, but deemed bail appropriate given the evidence presented and reconciliation between parties. Bail was approved on a bond of Rs. 20,000 with two sureties, conditional upon appearing before the lower court or surrender to police within 15 days. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
06-Apr-2026
Disposed
Principal District and Session Judge
-
30-Mar-2026
Hearing
Principal District and Session Judge
-
16-Mar-2026
Hearing
Principal District and Session Judge
-
25-Feb-2026
Hearing
Principal District and Session Judge
-
18-Feb-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
17-Feb-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 286/2026
Case Summary: 286/2026 The District and Sessions Court, Supaul granted bail to petitioners Nageshwar Mehta and Birendr Mehta in a case involving charges under IPC sections 126(2), 115(2), 118(1), 109(1), 351(2), and 352(2)/3(5) (relating to criminal intimidation and assault). The court found the accusations credible based on the informant's statement describing a violent altercation on December 31, 2025, but deemed bail appropriate given the evidence presented and reconciliation between parties. Bail was approved on a bond of Rs. 20,000 with two sureties, conditional upon appearing before the lower court or surrender to police within 15 days. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts