MD. TAIYUB KHAN AND OTHERS vs State of Bihar Advocate - JAI NARAYAN PANDEY — 281/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 126(2),115,110,303(2),352,351(2),3(5). Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 24th March 2026.
Anticipatory Bail
CNR: BRSU010018402026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
1790/2026
Filing Date
16-02-2026
Registration No
281/2026
Registration Date
16-02-2026
Court
DJ Div. Supaul
Judge
1-District and Additional Sessions Judge-I-cum-Special Judge SC/ST
Decision Date
24th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED
FIR Details
FIR Number
224
Police Station
KISHANPUR
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
MD. TAIYUB KHAN AND OTHERS
Adv. UNKNOWN
Respondent(s)
State of Bihar Advocate - JAI NARAYAN PANDEY
Hearing History
Judge: 1-District and Additional Sessions Judge-I-cum-Special Judge SC/ST
Disposed
HEARING
HEARING
HEARING
HEARING
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 24-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 10-03-2026 | HEARING | |
| 02-03-2026 | HEARING | |
| 26-02-2026 | HEARING | |
| 17-02-2026 | HEARING |
Final Orders / Judgements
The District and Sessions Court, Supaul granted anticipatory bail to the four accused persons (Mo. Tayyab, Mo. Mehbub, Bibi Tamso, and Rahat Prabeen) in a case involving charges under BNS sections 126(2), 115, 110, 303(2), 76, 352, and 351(2). The court found that while the allegations were serious, the complainant and injured party had reconciled, and no grievous injury was sustained by the principal complainant, warranting bail with two sureties of ₹10,000 each and appearance before the lower court within 15 days. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The District and Sessions Court, Supaul granted anticipatory bail to the four accused persons (Mo. Tayyab, Mo. Mehbub, Bibi Tamso, and Rahat Prabeen) in a case involving charges under BNS sections 126(2), 115, 110, 303(2), 76, 352, and 351(2). The court found that while the allegations were serious, the complainant and injured party had reconciled, and no grievous injury was sustained by the principal complainant, warranting bail with two sureties of ₹10,000 each and appearance before the lower court within 15 days. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts