MD RIYAMAT vs NAGESHWAR PANDIT AND OTHERS — 146/2021
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 341,323,307,504/34,379,324. Disposed: Contested--ACQUITTED on 10th March 2026.
SESSION CASE
CNR: BRSU010018052021
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
1584/2021
Filing Date
16-04-2021
Registration No
146/2021
Registration Date
16-04-2021
Court
DJ Div. Supaul
Judge
7-Principal District and Session Judge
Decision Date
10th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ACQUITTED
FIR Details
FIR Number
320
Police Station
SUPAUL
Year
2018
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
MD RIYAMAT
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
NAGESHWAR PANDIT AND OTHERS
Hearing History
Judge: 7-Principal District and Session Judge
Disposed
EVIDENCE
EVIDENCE
EVIDENCE
EVIDENCE
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 10-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 02-03-2026 | EVIDENCE | |
| 11-02-2026 | EVIDENCE | |
| 05-01-2026 | EVIDENCE | |
| 20-11-2025 | EVIDENCE |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary Case 1 (Session Case 146/2021): The court acquitted all three accused (Nageshwar Pandit, Sudhir Pandit, and Shravan Pandit) charged under IPC sections 341, 323, 307, 504/34, 379, and 324 due to insufficient evidence. The prosecution failed to prove the alleged assault and wrongful confinement incident through credible witness testimony, as the complainant did not produce medical or corroborating evidence to substantiate the charges. Case 2 (Session Case 146/2021 - Second judgment): The court acquitted Dr. Nagendra Yadav of charges under IPC sections 304, 420, and 120B relating to an alleged negligent surgery on the complainant's mother. The prosecution could not establish the accused's culpability through direct evidence or expert testimony, and the complainant failed to appear as a key witness despite adequate opportunity. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary Case 1 (Session Case 146/2021): The court acquitted all three accused (Nageshwar Pandit, Sudhir Pandit, and Shravan Pandit) charged under IPC sections 341, 323, 307, 504/34, 379, and 324 due to insufficient evidence. The prosecution failed to prove the alleged assault and wrongful confinement incident through credible witness testimony, as the complainant did not produce medical or corroborating evidence to substantiate the charges. Case 2 (Session Case 146/2021 - Second judgment): The court acquitted Dr. Nagendra Yadav of charges under IPC sections 304, 420, and 120B relating to an alleged negligent surgery on the complainant's mother. The prosecution could not establish the accused's culpability through direct evidence or expert testimony, and the complainant failed to appear as a key witness despite adequate opportunity. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts