TULSI SWARNKAR vs State of Bihar Advocate - JAI NARAYAN PANDEY — 275/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 334(1),307. Disposed: Contested--REJECT on 24th March 2026.

Case disposed

Anticipatory Bail

CNR: BRSU010017572026

Filing Number

1709/2026

Filing Date

13-Feb-2026

Registration No

275/2026

Registration Date

13-Feb-2026

Court

DJ Div. Supaul

Judge

7-Principal District and Session Judge

Decision Date

24-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--REJECT

Last updated 28-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

25

Police Station

KISHANPUR

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 334(1),307

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.TULSI SWARNKAR

    Adv. SANJAY KUMAR CHOUDHARY

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State of Bihar Advocate - JAI NARAYAN PANDEY

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 24-Mar-2026

    Copy of orderView PDF

    Case Summary: 275/2026 - Tulsi Swarnkar v. State of Bihar The Sessions Judge rejected Tulsi Swarnkar's anticipatory bail application in a theft case involving multiple jewelry shop burglaries on 26-27 January 2026. The court found sufficient prima facie evidence linking the petitioner to the crime: co-accused Mehadi Alam's confessional statement specifically named Swarnkar as the organizer, and stolen jewelry was recovered from locations identified in that statement, corroborating the confession. The court determined custodial interrogation was necessary and denied bail. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 24-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal District and Session Judge

  4. 17-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    Principal District and Session Judge

  5. 12-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    Principal District and Session Judge

  6. 28-Feb-2026

    Hearing

    Principal District and Session Judge

  7. 16-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  8. 13-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 275/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: 275/2026 - Tulsi Swarnkar v. State of Bihar The Sessions Judge rejected Tulsi Swarnkar's anticipatory bail application in a theft case involving multiple jewelry shop burglaries on 26-27 January 2026. The court found sufficient prima facie evidence linking the petitioner to the crime: co-accused Mehadi Alam's confessional statement specifically named Swarnkar as the organizer, and stolen jewelry was recovered from locations identified in that statement, corroborating the confession. The court determined custodial interrogation was necessary and denied bail. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case