MD. ISMAYIL AND OTHERS vs State of Bihar Advocate - JAI NARAYAN PANDEY — 268/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 309(4),. Disposed: Contested--REJECT on 25th March 2026.
Anticipatory Bail
CNR: BRSU010017502026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
1702/2026
Filing Date
13-02-2026
Registration No
268/2026
Registration Date
13-02-2026
Court
DJ Div. Supaul
Judge
7-Principal District and Session Judge
Decision Date
25th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--REJECT
FIR Details
FIR Number
267
Police Station
CHHATAPUR
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
MD. ISMAYIL AND OTHERS
Adv. SANJAY KUMAR SINGH
Respondent(s)
State of Bihar Advocate - JAI NARAYAN PANDEY
Hearing History
Judge: 7-Principal District and Session Judge
Disposed
HEARING
HEARING
HEARING
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 25-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 10-03-2026 | HEARING | |
| 27-02-2026 | HEARING | |
| 16-02-2026 | HEARING |
Final Orders / Judgements
The Court of Sessions Judge, Supaul rejected the anticipatory bail application filed by Md. Ismail and Md. Israfil in a dacoity case involving the snatching of Rs. 1,30,000. The court found the allegations serious, noting that an apprehended co-accused (Md. Munna) had confessed to the crime and specifically implicated both petitioners, with Rs. 60,000 being recovered from their house, warranting custodial interrogation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The Court of Sessions Judge, Supaul rejected the anticipatory bail application filed by Md. Ismail and Md. Israfil in a dacoity case involving the snatching of Rs. 1,30,000. The court found the allegations serious, noting that an apprehended co-accused (Md. Munna) had confessed to the crime and specifically implicated both petitioners, with Rs. 60,000 being recovered from their house, warranting custodial interrogation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts