ROHIT SARDAR vs State of Bihar Advocate - JAI NARAYAN PANDEY — 267/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 191(1),191(3),1212(1),121(2),132,115(2),118(1),109,76,324(4),324(5). Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 23rd March 2026.

Case disposed

Anticipatory Bail

CNR: BRSU010017482026

Filing Number

1700/2026

Filing Date

13-Feb-2026

Registration No

267/2026

Registration Date

13-Feb-2026

Court

DJ Div. Supaul

Judge

7-Principal District and Session Judge

Decision Date

23-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

Last updated 25-Apr-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

12

Police Station

PRATAPGANJ

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 191(1),191(3),1212(1),121(2),132,115(2),118(1),109,76,324(4),324(5)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.ROHIT SARDAR

    Adv. UNKNOWN

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State of Bihar Advocate - JAI NARAYAN PANDEY

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 23-Mar-2026

    Copy of orderView PDF

    The Sessions Judge, Supaul granted anticipatory bail to all three accused petitioners (Ravindra Sardar, Sonia Devi, and Rohit Sardar) in cases arising from a mob attack on police during a house search on 14.01.2026. The court found the allegations general in nature, noted the accused's clean antecedents and status as permanent residents of downtrodden society, and ruled they were entitled to bail with Rs. 20,000 bonds each and two sureties, conditional on compliance with section 482 B.N.S.S. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 23-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal District and Session Judge

  4. 10-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    Principal District and Session Judge

  5. 23-Feb-2026

    Hearing

    Principal District and Session Judge

  6. 16-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  7. 13-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 267/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Sessions Judge, Supaul granted anticipatory bail to all three accused petitioners (Ravindra Sardar, Sonia Devi, and Rohit Sardar) in cases arising from a mob attack on police during a house search on 14.01.2026. The court found the allegations general in nature, noted the accused's clean antecedents and status as permanent residents of downtrodden society, and ruled they were entitled to bail with Rs. 20,000 bonds each and two sureties, conditional on compliance with section 482 B.N.S.S. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case