KHAIRUN NISHA vs State of Bihar Advocate - JAI NARAYAN PANDEY — 252/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 80,123,3(5). Disposed: Contested--REJECT on 25th March 2026.

Case disposed

Anticipatory Bail

CNR: BRSU010015932026

Filing Number

1547/2026

Filing Date

11-Feb-2026

Registration No

252/2026

Registration Date

11-Feb-2026

Court

DJ Div. Supaul

Judge

7-Principal District and Session Judge

Decision Date

25-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--REJECT

Last updated 28-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

60

Police Station

SUPAUL

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 80,123,3(5)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.KHAIRUN NISHA

    Adv. SUDHIR KUMAR JHA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State of Bihar Advocate - JAI NARAYAN PANDEY

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 25-Mar-2026

    Copy of orderView PDF

    Case Summary: A.B.A. 252/2026 The Sessions Judge rejected Khairun Nisha's anticipatory bail application in a dowry death case. The accused, the deceased's mother-in-law, was charged under BNS sections 80, 123, and 3(5) after her daughter-in-law died of poison within 8 months of marriage, allegedly following dowry harassment and threats for Rs. 5 lakh. The court found the allegations serious, noted witness corroboration, considered the presumption under section 117 of the Indian Evidence Act against the accused, and determined custodial interrogation necessary due to risk of evidence tampering. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 25-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal District and Session Judge

  4. 12-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    Principal District and Session Judge

  5. 25-Feb-2026

    Hearing

    Principal District and Session Judge

  6. 12-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  7. 11-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 252/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: A.B.A. 252/2026 The Sessions Judge rejected Khairun Nisha's anticipatory bail application in a dowry death case. The accused, the deceased's mother-in-law, was charged under BNS sections 80, 123, and 3(5) after her daughter-in-law died of poison within 8 months of marriage, allegedly following dowry harassment and threats for Rs. 5 lakh. The court found the allegations serious, noted witness corroboration, considered the presumption under section 117 of the Indian Evidence Act against the accused, and determined custodial interrogation necessary due to risk of evidence tampering. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case